Episode 238

Eddington (2025)

This week we cover Ari Aster's "Eddinton". Released in 2025 and starring Pedro Pascal, Joaquin Phoenix, Luke Grimes, Emma Stone, Austin Butler, Deirdre O'Connel and Michael Ward, and set in Aster's hometown during 2020 at the height of COVID-19. We discuss how timing is everything, Phoenix might not be a great person in real life, and how this movie stands out as a director trying to say something without saying anything at all.

Guest Links

Left of the Projector Links

Official Website

Left of the Projector on Instagram

Left of the Projector on Patreon

Left of the Projector on Threadless

Host Links

Evan's Letterboxd

Bill's Instagram

Bill's Letterboxd

Ward's Instagram

Ward's Letterboxd

Transcript
Speaker:

Track 1: I honestly believe that the cult open gets more listeners than someone who,

Speaker:

Track 1: they're like, oh, here's a, not an ad, but like, oh, all right,

Speaker:

Track 1: let's see if it will work today.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, already you're better than you have been the past couple of times.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah, you haven't like frozen out at all. You haven't.

Speaker:

Track 1: I am using Chrome this time instead of Firefox, which is what I used to always

Speaker:

Track 1: use until I realized that it's better in Firefox, but maybe for me, it's not.

Speaker:

Track 2: So what movie are we talking about?

Speaker:

Track 1: See, this is the cold open bill. You don't have to say it yet.

Speaker:

Track 1: Hello, and welcome to Left of the Projector. I'm your host, Evan,

Speaker:

Track 1: back again with another film discussion from the left.

Speaker:

Track 1: If you'd like to support the show for as little as $3 a month,

Speaker:

Track 1: you can go to Patreon forward slash Left of the Projector Pod.

Speaker:

Track 1: If you'd like to dress in style, we've got shirts.

Speaker:

Track 1: And at leftoftheprojectorpod.threadless.com, you can grab one and show everyone

Speaker:

Track 1: you've got the best taste around.

Speaker:

Track 1: Wherever you're listening, give us a rating and subscribe so you'll be notified

Speaker:

Track 1: of our weekly episodes that drop every Tuesday. And now on to the show.

Speaker:

Track 1: This week on Left of the Projector, we will be talking about the 2025 film Eddington by Ari Aster.

Speaker:

Track 1: You may know him from other films such as Hereditary, Midsommar, and Bo is Afraid.

Speaker:

Track 1: It stars Joaquin Phoenix, Pedro Pascal, Luke Grimes, Michael Ward,

Speaker:

Track 1: Austin Butler, and Emma Stone.

Speaker:

Track 1: With me on this week's episode, I have just Bill. How are you doing today?

Speaker:

Track 2: Doing well. How are you?

Speaker:

Track 1: Ward is still on his quest, so he will return soon.

Speaker:

Track 1: But this may not be a new film. It came out last May in 2025.

Speaker:

Track 1: But it kind of doesn't matter when you watch this movie. It's pretty relevant.

Speaker:

Track 1: And you chose this film, Bill. Normally we have guests. They choose films.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, we didn't.

Speaker:

Track 1: Kind of chose it.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, we had options, you know, we were looking to pad out our,

Speaker:

Track 2: our backlog and, uh, you know, I suggested a couple of different newer stuff and this is what we, uh.

Speaker:

Track 2: We came to came down on.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah. And I had, I had not seen it yet.

Speaker:

Track 2: And, um, neither had I.

Speaker:

Track 1: I feel like I'll be chastised. You know, everyone was like, Oh,

Speaker:

Track 1: have you seen this film? Are you going to make an episode on it?

Speaker:

Track 1: Well, well, listeners, we are.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, honestly, like I find, you know, like, yes, we are a podcast talks about

Speaker:

Track 2: movies from like a leftist perspective, uh, you know, from a Marxist analysis,

Speaker:

Track 2: like, honestly, like I find the like deliberate viewing of movies that are intentionally political.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like it's like it's cheap it's easy like i would rather personally i would rather

Speaker:

Track 2: look at movies that are made in the context of the culture without being specifically

Speaker:

Track 2: political and then analyze it from that perspective as opposed to seek out movies

Speaker:

Track 2: that are like intending to be political but.

Speaker:

Track 1: For anyone who doesn't know the film takes place during the beginning of the

Speaker:

Track 1: COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, I believe it's May 2020, in a small town in New Mexico.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's basically about two competing sort of people.

Speaker:

Track 1: Joaquin Phoenix is the town sheriff, and Pedro Pascal is the town's mayor.

Speaker:

Track 1: And it ends up being them competing to vote for re-election or oppose him, oppose Pedro Pascal.

Speaker:

Track 1: And it really speaks to anyone who remembers and hasn't completely blanked it

Speaker:

Track 1: from their mind what happened in 2020 where, like,

Speaker:

Track 1: mask mandates and COVID shots and store closings and social distancing has,

Speaker:

Track 1: like, literally all of these things in it. And what.

Speaker:

Track 1: Ari Aster said about the movie, and I think it's worthwhile mentioning at the beginning.

Speaker:

Track 1: They asked him what it was about, and he said, if I had to boil it down,

Speaker:

Track 1: I'd say Eddington is really about a data center being built.

Speaker:

Track 1: He says, quote, from my perspective, a common enemy in the film is the distraction.

Speaker:

Track 1: We're living in a collapsing system where political battles mesmerize us as

Speaker:

Track 1: big tech capitalizes everything.

Speaker:

Track 1: What has really happened, which COVID-19 pushed even further,

Speaker:

Track 1: is that people are powerless in this system, and they've been taken away

Speaker:

Track 1: from having any access to changing world control over

Speaker:

Track 1: data and information is the privilege of power and that

Speaker:

Track 1: works even better if your suspicions and your anger can

Speaker:

Track 1: be displaced onto your neighbor the old idea

Speaker:

Track 1: of democracy which is that we would be in a countervailing force against the

Speaker:

Track 1: power run amok is gone completely covid cut the last link the pandemic did and

Speaker:

Track 1: out there is power big power we haven't found a way to deal with it yet we're

Speaker:

Track 1: gonna have to and that's what the characters in Eddington are driving themselves

Speaker:

Track 1: mad trying to do, whether they know it or not.

Speaker:

Track 2: The data center thing seems like a... Most of that, I would say,

Speaker:

Track 2: is an accurate assessment.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, it is his fucking movie, but like...

Speaker:

Track 2: The data center seems so secondary.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, in terms of like, yes, information and like the fact that like conspiratorial

Speaker:

Track 2: thought is conspiratorial thought and information manipulation is such a huge

Speaker:

Track 2: proponent of this, this movie.

Speaker:

Track 2: But what does that inherently have to do with data center?

Speaker:

Track 2: Nothing. especially because most of this the main like person pushing the like

Speaker:

Track 2: the misinformation or like put they're not even it's not even from ai it's from

Speaker:

Track 2: an actual like fucking like conspiracy pizza gate pushing q anon type like.

Speaker:

Track 1: What makes it even further is so

Speaker:

Track 1: you have a lot of characters in this movie that definitely fills pieces that

Speaker:

Track 1: were happening in 2020 so the other context is so the son of Pedro Pascal is

Speaker:

Track 1: sort of getting involved in the political Black Lives Matter kind of movement

Speaker:

Track 1: as it's starting to kind of take hold in May.

Speaker:

Track 1: And then the summer of 2020, you have like a girl to school who already has

Speaker:

Track 1: kind of political leanings.

Speaker:

Track 1: And you have people that are also kind of joining the fight simply because like

Speaker:

Track 1: they want to, you know, they want to make a girl like them.

Speaker:

Track 1: And so they become political, you know, and you have, but which,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know fine if that's going to be a radicalization,

Speaker:

Track 1: which I think in this case completely flips on its head it's

Speaker:

Track 1: not the thing but I think my point is that the data

Speaker:

Track 1: center I agree is not the thing that's important but if the data center and

Speaker:

Track 1: big capital could do anything that would benefit their cause it would be to

Speaker:

Track 1: make people fight with each other and fight culture wars instead of being mad at the actual villain.

Speaker:

Track 2: If you haven't seen this movie like everything it.

Speaker:

Track 2: Think back to 2020 and everything that was happening. It's George Floyd,

Speaker:

Track 2: BLM, COVID, mask mandates.

Speaker:

Track 2: Those are all like the primary, like motivating issues in this movie.

Speaker:

Track 2: The data center seems so secondary, especially in terms of like that stuff and

Speaker:

Track 2: the like deliberate, you know, oh, I'm sorry.

Speaker:

Track 2: And also pizza get shit. And like, which I find considering the fact that since

Speaker:

Track 2: this movie was released,

Speaker:

Track 2: we have been inundated with actual evidence regarding like Epstein and all of

Speaker:

Track 2: that shit felt super kind of tone deaf.

Speaker:

Track 2: And because this

Speaker:

Track 2: movie posits this movie comes from

Speaker:

Track 2: a perspective of 2020 in which people were like there was the manipulation of

Speaker:

Track 2: the idea of the whole like there was the manipulation of all that and yes the

Speaker:

Track 2: the whole like pizzagate stuff was being manipulated and like q anon and like the, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: whatever, like the, you know, the government and the elites, like, you know.

Speaker:

Track 2: Being downplayed by the system. And then in the movie, it is also being treated that way.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it's like, yes, in 2020, that's the way it was being like publicly,

Speaker:

Track 2: but like we're past that. Like even when he was making this movie.

Speaker:

Track 1: We already knew more than we did.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah. So it's like, it felt super kind of like gross and like really fucked

Speaker:

Track 2: up to like, basically have a movie that is coming from the perspective of,

Speaker:

Track 2: these accusations are conspiratorial thought that should be disregarded.

Speaker:

Track 2: And that, like, it just felt not good.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean, the only pass I could give him for it is if he's truly trying to create

Speaker:

Track 1: a movie that is a snapshot of

Speaker:

Track 1: 2020, then it's reasonable. But at the same time, like, you could also...

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't know.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, which I think this movie is easily 20 years ahead of its time.

Speaker:

Track 2: And by ahead of its time, I mean, like this movie doesn't work now.

Speaker:

Track 2: This movie does not work in the current context of our time.

Speaker:

Track 2: It was made too soon. And like, I don't mean that to be like,

Speaker:

Track 2: oh, it's ahead of its time. Like it's groundbreaking.

Speaker:

Track 2: I just mean like it, we are still, we are still actively figuring out and dealing

Speaker:

Track 2: with the repercussions and the fallout.

Speaker:

Track 2: Of these events and to

Speaker:

Track 2: fictionalize them and like portray them in a movie at this point in time is

Speaker:

Track 2: to do so in a way that is you're gonna miss like it's coming out with like this

Speaker:

Track 2: stuff is still all fucking raw yeah no i i i.

Speaker:

Track 1: Uh agree with that i think um i yeah i mean i'm trying to think of another example

Speaker:

Track 1: of a movie where they're analyzing and discussing a topic that is still so recent

Speaker:

Track 1: that it can't it's also can't act i don't know.

Speaker:

Track 2: Well let's look at one that's successfully yeah well that's that uh let's look

Speaker:

Track 2: at battle of battle of edgiers and how battle of edgiers came out like what

Speaker:

Track 2: 10 years after like a successful revolution yeah about that and like you know

Speaker:

Track 2: 10 years and like 15 years I think after like the actual events it's portraying right.

Speaker:

Track 1: It could be less than 15 but yes.

Speaker:

Track 2: But it does it successfully because of, because with the clarity of vision,

Speaker:

Track 2: the manner in which it is balanced as opposed to this.

Speaker:

Track 1: Well, here's what I would say as to maybe why that's, why that's possible.

Speaker:

Track 1: Number one, I don't think, and we say this all the time, like,

Speaker:

Track 1: oh, like when we talked about Black Panther, oh, Hollywood and Marvel wouldn't

Speaker:

Track 1: let you really have any revolutionary thoughts in the movie.

Speaker:

Track 1: Would hollywood allow ari aster to make a movie that truly critiques 2020 and

Speaker:

Track 1: what happened for what it was and it's rather than actually kind of almost excusing it in some ways.

Speaker:

Track 2: Right well honestly beyond like the whole

Speaker:

Track 2: 2020 thing would hollywood i don't know ari aster i don't know him from a fucking

Speaker:

Track 2: hole in the wall despite the fact that he apparently he was born in jersey he

Speaker:

Track 2: was born in Princeton I don't know Ari Aster and like there's not like a ton

Speaker:

Track 2: like he's kind of closed mouth would Hollywood let somebody make a movie that's straight,

Speaker:

Track 2: acknowledges and validates every

Speaker:

Track 2: fucking claim about child sex

Speaker:

Track 2: abuse no that is my that is the big that is the to me that is the glaring issue

Speaker:

Track 2: like honestly if all of that wasn't in this this would be a different movie

Speaker:

Track 2: and it wouldn't feel so blinkered is it even necessary.

Speaker:

Track 1: For the movie.

Speaker:

Track 2: No except for the fact that again he's making a movie about 2020 and this that

Speaker:

Track 2: was a huge topic because of all of this right.

Speaker:

Track 1: People don't remember there is this thing called q anon is it still going on do they still do that.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah i mean kind of i don't think they're as like they're not really as like

Speaker:

Track 2: they don't post the mail post about it they don't have to be because the like

Speaker:

Track 2: The people behind QAnon are now fully in power.

Speaker:

Track 1: Working the government.

Speaker:

Track 2: In power. Yeah, like they won.

Speaker:

Track 1: And for people who don't know and remember what Pizzagate was,

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't necessarily think we need to litigate that here.

Speaker:

Track 1: But if you don't remember, you're maybe younger or just you blacked out that

Speaker:

Track 1: period of time, which honestly, good for you. Don't blame you. Yeah, I don't blame you.

Speaker:

Track 1: You could look that up and see how that kind of fits and in a weird way this,

Speaker:

Track 1: The way that the movie is sort of, I don't mean this as an insult or as a positive thing.

Speaker:

Track 1: It reminds me of sort of the way that Quentin Tarantino's Once Upon a Time in

Speaker:

Track 1: Hollywood sort of takes a historical event with sort of plot points and then

Speaker:

Track 1: just sort of like recreates his story around it.

Speaker:

Track 1: In a way, this is like that, except it's mostly accurate.

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't know. I wish he'd take more liberties. I don't know.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like made it more of a, I don't want to call it art. I don't know exactly what I'm trying to say.

Speaker:

Track 2: It is more accurate. But then also the things that are fabricated for the movie are too, are not.

Speaker:

Track 1: Unrealistic enough.

Speaker:

Track 2: For instance. So this movie starts out pretty slow and then it goes off the fucking rails.

Speaker:

Track 2: Else when and there's a lot of stuff that just kind of converges and so when we come to the end,

Speaker:

Track 2: when we come to like i guess like the last like what like 40 minutes and the

Speaker:

Track 2: the blm of it all and antifa of it all really ratchets up and goes to the roof we get the fake antifa.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it's like the way he introduces that, and because we never,

Speaker:

Track 2: ever see anything from the perspective of those people, we never have any concrete

Speaker:

Track 2: information about them.

Speaker:

Track 2: You then are left. It's like, what is he trying to say here?

Speaker:

Track 2: Is he saying that there are people? Is he coming down and saying that Antifa

Speaker:

Track 2: is a organized terrorist group?

Speaker:

Track 2: Or is he saying that people on the far right were manipulating things and using things?

Speaker:

Track 2: Or is he saying, it's like, it's very unclear in a lot of ways.

Speaker:

Track 2: And not so much very unclear as he leaves it up to a very loose interpretation,

Speaker:

Track 2: which leads you to, to question a lot of it.

Speaker:

Track 2: And then it's like, where does he stand on this?

Speaker:

Track 2: Is he okay with, you know, is he okay with, does he support like radical, like black liberation?

Speaker:

Track 2: Or is he saying like these fucking people that want things because at the same time,

Speaker:

Track 2: he so repeatedly posits and puts frames the young people in Eddington who are.

Speaker:

Track 2: Fighting and protesting and marching as like fools.

Speaker:

Track 1: And performative completely.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah. But then, and then at the same time, you have these like,

Speaker:

Track 2: these people, it's like, what are you trying to say, man? What are you saying here?

Speaker:

Track 1: Well, I mean, if you think back to 2020 and, you know, you, you probably,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know, going to rallies and the amount of people in the street,

Speaker:

Track 1: I would be willing to bet you that many of those people hadn't engaged in any

Speaker:

Track 1: kind of political protest before.

Speaker:

Track 1: So there were people like those kids that are like, holy shit,

Speaker:

Track 1: like I am white and I am privileged for all the things that I have.

Speaker:

Track 1: And maybe I should unpack that.

Speaker:

Track 1: But he doesn't give the counter to that in any way as to like someone in the

Speaker:

Track 1: town who actually is black.

Speaker:

Track 1: And in a way they actually instead use the black cop in the town to being like, hey, you're black.

Speaker:

Track 1: How come you don't care about this? Like, well, because he's a fucking cop and

Speaker:

Track 1: cops don't care about that because they are the boot. They're not.

Speaker:

Track 1: They're the boot. And so, in a way, he does kind of cop out on that and makes it,

Speaker:

Track 1: you could view it as Ari Aster saying that the Black Lives Matter movement as a whole is and was a joke.

Speaker:

Track 2: But at the same time, I feel like looking back at 2020 and seeing what came

Speaker:

Track 2: of the Black Lives Matter movement—,

Speaker:

Track 2: we can say like but at the same time to

Speaker:

Track 2: broadly paint individuals that

Speaker:

Track 2: did become radicalized and broadly

Speaker:

Track 2: paint people that were that really genuinely did come out and care as ignorant

Speaker:

Track 2: or not ignorant but like naive and childish or purely doing it for performative

Speaker:

Track 2: is kind of fucked up Yeah.

Speaker:

Track 1: You're right.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it felt because so like this movie vacillated between like trying to present

Speaker:

Track 2: a far right conservative criticism like it could have been directed by Ben Shapiro

Speaker:

Track 2: to like all the way to like a super,

Speaker:

Track 2: you know, like shit lib viewpoint.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like a like sincere and I heavily air quote sincere liberal viewpoint of things.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean, that leads you to believe that he's either views it from one of those

Speaker:

Track 1: sides, probably the shit-lib side.

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't think Ari Aster is like a right-wing conservative. Seems unlikely.

Speaker:

Track 1: But he, I don't know. It's kind of a cop-out there.

Speaker:

Track 2: And— It's a deeply cynical movie.

Speaker:

Track 1: Oh, I mean, I think his movies in general are fairly cynical in general. I mean...

Speaker:

Track 2: This feels more cynical than... I mean, I've seen Hereditary and I've seen Midsommar.

Speaker:

Track 2: I've not seen the other one that you mentioned.

Speaker:

Track 1: Bo's Afraid.

Speaker:

Track 2: Bo's Afraid.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

Track 2: But those are presented in almost...

Speaker:

Track 2: A magical realism universe there is

Speaker:

Track 2: a difference between having a cynical movie that is

Speaker:

Track 2: very much rooted in like kind of like a a fantastic world and this which is

Speaker:

Track 2: like it's it's fucking here like it's it's based in this world very much so

Speaker:

Track 2: it's based in the place he grew up in yeah no No.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's true.

Speaker:

Track 1: That, what was I going to say? It is, it's cynical.

Speaker:

Track 1: And the other thing that I think maybe he does get right is he presents the

Speaker:

Track 1: presumably like Democrat candidate, which is Pedro Pascal, who's the mayor of

Speaker:

Track 1: the town, the small town,

Speaker:

Track 1: as sort of being in bed with big tech.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like he's getting pushed to open this data center. And I think in that sense,

Speaker:

Track 1: he is accurately portraying the...

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't want to say left, but I mean the party, the Democrats, the liberals.

Speaker:

Track 1: He's portraying them pretty well in the sense that they will do whatever they're

Speaker:

Track 1: told from a corporation perspective.

Speaker:

Track 1: They'll take money from whoever. Clearly, he's taking money from the status

Speaker:

Track 1: center for his campaign to allow them to do it.

Speaker:

Track 1: He already diverted funds to build some, like, big road.

Speaker:

Track 1: But then what I find interesting is the right-wing conspiracy nut.

Speaker:

Track 1: So the mother-in-law of Joaquin Phoenix is like a super conspiracy nutjob.

Speaker:

Track 1: She's like reading about all these things like, oh, they did a test for pandemics

Speaker:

Track 1: three years before the pandemic.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's like, hey, lady, that's in case there is one and they want to prepare.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's not because they were preparing for the one that.

Speaker:

Track 1: Anyway, she's a nutjob and she's against all these things.

Speaker:

Track 1: But as soon as, spoiler, at the end, when Joaquin Phoenix becomes mayor and

Speaker:

Track 1: she pulls the strings, she is now in bed with all the same people that the liberals

Speaker:

Track 1: were in bed with, which shows to me that all of these people serve the same master.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's just how they want to sugarcoat it for their constituents.

Speaker:

Track 1: And in their case, it's right-wing conspiracy nonsense, Pizzagate bullshit.

Speaker:

Track 2: Right. Which I guess like, you know, I guess what it comes down to is my issue

Speaker:

Track 2: with the cynicism is I find the, the, the way these kinds of things are perspective.

Speaker:

Track 2: It's, it's painted from a very like, um, no theory having perspective.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it's like, you know what? You're right.

Speaker:

Track 2: You're absolutely right. They both serve the same master.

Speaker:

Track 2: They're both, you know, and there's been mass media manipulation.

Speaker:

Track 2: But all you did was make a movie being like, everybody sucks and everything is bad.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like that doesn't, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: You've not, you're not helping either.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like you, when you do that,

Speaker:

Track 2: you're not doing anything to benefit anything other than providing media for smug,

Speaker:

Track 2: self-righteous people who don't participate in activism or organizing or actively

Speaker:

Track 2: perform praxis and try to make the world a better place.

Speaker:

Track 2: All you're doing is perform you're making smug self-righteous media for those

Speaker:

Track 2: people to watch and then go that's right everybody sucks they're all bad and

Speaker:

Track 2: now i will watch my movie and then sit down and do fucking nothing and i think

Speaker:

Track 2: that's what pisses me off.

Speaker:

Track 1: So do you think that the the audience that watches this and likes it would you say that it's liberals,

Speaker:

Track 1: because i feel like they would be mad at this person like that like i feel like

Speaker:

Track 1: if they were to watch it i would almost be mad that the way that you're portraying me unless they believe i.

Speaker:

Track 2: Would say it's more it's like rad lips.

Speaker:

Track 1: They would like this movie or like ultra did not perform well in the box office

Speaker:

Track 1: for anyone it 25 million dollar budget made 13.7 million so it was a flop.

Speaker:

Track 2: I think i think it's because going back i think this movie is literally i came

Speaker:

Track 2: out 22 20 years too fucking early. It's too raw.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, this is not an analysis of shit and then looking at how it led up to it.

Speaker:

Track 2: This is just watching what happened five years ago and being deeply uncomfortable.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, that's what it is.

Speaker:

Track 1: Is this, is this a...

Speaker:

Track 2: The COVID stuff.

Speaker:

Track 1: Is this a conservative movie?

Speaker:

Track 2: At times it really feels like it.

Speaker:

Track 1: Because...

Speaker:

Track 2: At times it feels like it.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean, whether or not you watch it, and like I watch, obviously I'm not on

Speaker:

Track 1: the side of Joaquin Phoenix and the fucked up shit he does.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean, first he's just sort of like, you know, refusing to wear his mask and,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know, like sort of the things that were happening at the time.

Speaker:

Track 1: Dealing with a town that sort of has people who are trying to comply. They don't want to die.

Speaker:

Track 1: And then people who are just like, this is all stupid. It's all conspiracy. theory and

Speaker:

Track 1: then as the movie progresses he just goes off

Speaker:

Track 1: the deep end his wife has now left him he's living with

Speaker:

Track 1: this crazy uh mother-in-law who's a conspiracy theorist

Speaker:

Track 1: and he ends up shooting dead like this unhoused person in the town dumps his

Speaker:

Track 1: body in the river okay that's fucked up and then he goes a step further and

Speaker:

Track 1: snipes snipes from like a distance the he he snipes pedro pascal while he's

Speaker:

Track 1: in his house, and then his son.

Speaker:

Track 1: And he doesn't get rid of their bodies. Instead, he blames Antifa by putting

Speaker:

Track 1: up a Black Lives Matter slogan. And this...

Speaker:

Track 2: And frames his officer.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yes, then frames his officer when they start to... When the natives who live

Speaker:

Track 1: in the... Indigenous people who live in the reservation right across the line

Speaker:

Track 1: are being like, oh, well, am I forgetting something?

Speaker:

Track 2: They're the only people in this entire movie that are not fucking assholes or idiots.

Speaker:

Track 2: The only people in this entire movie who are presented as being reasonable,

Speaker:

Track 2: intelligent human beings are the two indigenous officers from Pueblo, the reservation cops.

Speaker:

Track 2: They're the only people who are not fucking idiots.

Speaker:

Track 1: And they're being prevented from actually investigating because if they did,

Speaker:

Track 1: they would figure out clearly that it was the sheriff who committed the crimes.

Speaker:

Track 1: He puts it all together when he sees the whiteboard in the office, the handwriting.

Speaker:

Track 1: But this is also a thing that,

Speaker:

Track 1: I could see why Ari Aster is doing this. He's, this is definitely what,

Speaker:

Track 1: this definitely happened,

Speaker:

Track 1: where right-wing agitators framed riots on Black Lives Matter in order to delegitimize

Speaker:

Track 1: the movement. This was actively happening.

Speaker:

Track 1: But then he takes it a step further when he has this, like, Black Ops plane

Speaker:

Track 1: coming in, as you mentioned before, of these, like, super elite,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know, Antifa terrorists who are clearly well-funded.

Speaker:

Track 1: And if you're on the conspiracy side, you'd be like, oh, well,

Speaker:

Track 1: like George Soros paid for that plane and to have them go in, you know.

Speaker:

Track 2: That was exactly what I thought to myself. I was like, what's that symbol on the tail of the plane?

Speaker:

Track 2: I'm like, is that a George Soros thing?

Speaker:

Track 1: It wasn't clear, but to me that was the implication in my mind.

Speaker:

Track 1: And so, and then it goes off the rails even further where they claim,

Speaker:

Track 1: this terrorist come in and are like killing everyone in order to blame it on Antifa again.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like, they're trying to get the cop who's in prison out of prison,

Speaker:

Track 1: and then they set up landmines and blow shit up, and, like, one of them dies.

Speaker:

Track 1: One of them, like, loses his—well, does it lose his arm?

Speaker:

Track 2: The black cop? The white deputy—no, the white deputy— He dies.

Speaker:

Track 1: Loses his arm.

Speaker:

Track 2: He dies, and his arm is blown up.

Speaker:

Track 1: Right. And the other guy, the black cop, doesn't die. He just kind of,

Speaker:

Track 1: like, disfigured later.

Speaker:

Track 2: He gets—yeah, he gets, like, all scarred. And he remains a police officer.

Speaker:

Track 2: He becomes, I assume, sheriff.

Speaker:

Track 1: I would assume it's a sheriff. And then you have... What makes it...

Speaker:

Track 1: Mike, one of my several critiques of this movie is that the one-and-a-half-hour setup was too long.

Speaker:

Track 2: Oh, God, yeah.

Speaker:

Track 1: They could have...

Speaker:

Track 2: This movie...

Speaker:

Track 2: It goes from zero to 60 after an hour and a half, and then from 60 to 200 in, like, 10 minutes.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah. Yeah, and so, like, the terrorists are then blamed, and then sort of,

Speaker:

Track 1: we already alluded to the ending already, which is, like, a most insane scene.

Speaker:

Track 1: So, Joaquin Phoenix goes into a gun shop and brings out just,

Speaker:

Track 1: like, a massive automatic, you know, I don't know what that kind of gun is called.

Speaker:

Track 1: We need Ward here to tell us.

Speaker:

Track 2: It looked like a bar, like a belt-feed automatic rifle. It had a full- Back. Box.

Speaker:

Track 2: Well, no, he was carrying other guns on his back, but that gun itself looked,

Speaker:

Track 2: it looked like a mounted, what would normally be a mounted automatic gun with a case, a box of.

Speaker:

Track 1: And it rips the reservation's police person's leg right off.

Speaker:

Track 1: And then the very final scene of this crazy shootout is the kid in town ends

Speaker:

Track 1: up shooting to dead the Antifa, quote unquote,

Speaker:

Track 1: terrorist after he had stabbed Joaquin Phoenix in the face, like the head.

Speaker:

Track 2: The head. He stabs him directly in the top of the skull.

Speaker:

Track 1: Which apparently doesn't kill him, and it just makes it so he can't really talk

Speaker:

Track 1: very well and he's paralyzed and then he somehow becomes uh becomes mayor and the conspiracy because.

Speaker:

Track 2: There's no it's in no context.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah and so the other guy's dead and that's the

Speaker:

Track 1: only one that's left it's uh the data center gets built

Speaker:

Track 1: and you just sort of like this is what makes it accurate at

Speaker:

Track 1: the end is this is actually what did happen the governor was a government takeover

Speaker:

Track 1: at a sense of these conspiracy right-wing lunatics which is what happened i

Speaker:

Track 1: mean i realized that joe biden was elected in 2020 but he didn't stop the didn't

Speaker:

Track 1: do anything to prevent anything that happened afterward no in fact and like.

Speaker:

Track 2: I said that's why this i feel like this movie doesn't really work because in

Speaker:

Track 2: a lot of ways it's unclear like the creator's perspective feels unclear but

Speaker:

Track 2: more importantly it's just too soon like i just.

Speaker:

Track 1: Let me ask you this we're.

Speaker:

Track 2: Still dealing with stuff from this and it.

Speaker:

Track 1: Feels... Do you think this film is a satire? Or do you think he was aiming for

Speaker:

Track 1: it to be a satire of that era?

Speaker:

Track 2: I think, yes, I do think it's supposed to be a satire. And I just think that,

Speaker:

Track 2: I don't think you can make a satire about something that happened five years

Speaker:

Track 2: ago when part of that satire includes a very important point about child sex trafficking.

Speaker:

Track 2: When at this current moment when he made that movie we are we're learning that

Speaker:

Track 2: those things are very much fucking real yeah.

Speaker:

Track 1: One thing I, like, something that this, I've been seeing Hereditary or the other,

Speaker:

Track 1: his other movies since, like, they came out, so I haven't, don't have a full context.

Speaker:

Track 1: But one thing that people say about Special Hereditary, I think, is the core,

Speaker:

Track 1: and it goes back to that quote that I read at the beginning of how he sees the

Speaker:

Track 1: movie and the society in America,

Speaker:

Track 1: is that at the core, I think that if you got Ari Aster to tell you things,

Speaker:

Track 1: he would probably say he believes in family values and the core of patriarchy.

Speaker:

Track 1: Maybe he wouldn't use those words exactly, but I think that sort of he sees

Speaker:

Track 1: that as a good thing, but he sees in America that these things are decaying,

Speaker:

Track 1: that like the family unit is under attack, whether that's a good thing or a

Speaker:

Track 1: bad thing, especially in Hereditary, the way their family structure.

Speaker:

Track 1: So it makes me think that this is he's trying

Speaker:

Track 1: to show through 2020 like how rotten these family structures and core has become

Speaker:

Track 1: and i'm not like giving him an off as saying that he's i think maybe you could

Speaker:

Track 1: make an argument that he succeeds in some way there i don't necessarily think

Speaker:

Track 1: that the movie as a whole works for that though.

Speaker:

Track 2: I think that to me and i'm sorry if i keep coming But like the entire scene,

Speaker:

Track 2: so there's a character played by Austin Butler.

Speaker:

Track 2: What's his name? Vernon.

Speaker:

Track 1: Vernon Jefferson Peak.

Speaker:

Track 2: Vernon Jefferson Peak, a radical cult leader. And he is clearly posited as like

Speaker:

Track 2: a Cuban on type person, um,

Speaker:

Track 2: but specifically very much just about like exploiting people who believe they

Speaker:

Track 2: have been abused, sexually abused as children or trafficked as children.

Speaker:

Track 2: And when he shows up at the house, uh, Joe cross walking Phoenix's character,

Speaker:

Track 2: he shows up at the house with walking Phoenix, his wife and the stone.

Speaker:

Track 2: And he starts, uh,

Speaker:

Track 2: telling his story and Joaquin Phoenix doesn't believe him.

Speaker:

Track 2: And then he has that whole thing where he starts talking about how like predators have feelings too.

Speaker:

Track 2: A predator can love their prey, a prey, an abuser can love.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it just felt so like, what are, are you trying to,

Speaker:

Track 2: are you trying to elide from this are

Speaker:

Track 2: you trying to you know take attention off of this what are you doing here man

Speaker:

Track 2: because again this shit is fucking the shit that has been revealed i mean and

Speaker:

Track 2: was revealed when he made this movie this feels not good yeah.

Speaker:

Track 1: I can see that i mean And I have to believe what he's actually trying to say

Speaker:

Track 1: is that, I mean, as you see right now, you see, like, Pam Bode and, like,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know, the government and right-wingers trying to obfuscate from the Epstein

Speaker:

Track 1: stuff, you know, deflect in different ways.

Speaker:

Track 1: He's like, oh, like, you know, 14 is the age, you know, like the age of like

Speaker:

Track 1: all these ridiculous things.

Speaker:

Track 1: And I think that in a positive reading of Joaquin Phoenix, he is the person

Speaker:

Track 1: that's unwilling to accept that his that there are these evil people and that

Speaker:

Track 1: probably he is a predator himself.

Speaker:

Track 1: You don't really have any information on his backstory. You do learn that his

Speaker:

Track 1: wife, Emma Stone, had gotten pregnant at a young age and then had an abortion,

Speaker:

Track 1: and they try to insinuate that it's by Pedro Pascal.

Speaker:

Track 1: She denies this. You never find out the truth. But my bet—.

Speaker:

Track 2: I think it's clearly the father.

Speaker:

Track 1: Who is?

Speaker:

Track 2: I think it was clearly the father. The father— Emma Stone's father.

Speaker:

Track 1: Oh, but who's not in the film? She's not there. He dies.

Speaker:

Track 2: No, he's dead.

Speaker:

Track 1: He dies. They have a little vigil frame in the living room.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah, he's dead when the movie starts.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah, that makes more sense.

Speaker:

Track 2: If he was the previous sheriff.

Speaker:

Track 1: Right.

Speaker:

Track 1: And it makes it, maybe it's one of those situations where Joaquin Phoenix knows

Speaker:

Track 1: that, and he is, you know, being like, well, she loved him.

Speaker:

Track 1: He loved her. Like, you know, kind of thing. Like the way that you try and,

Speaker:

Track 1: you know, deflect from this.

Speaker:

Track 2: Also, we can't ignore the fact that the character of Mike, one of the deputies,

Speaker:

Track 2: who is a, you know, an adult, he is a sheriff's deputy, was in a relationship with that girl.

Speaker:

Track 1: Who was 18. Who was 18. But would have been younger at the time.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah. Like he says, oh, she's 18. But we don't get ages on like anybody.

Speaker:

Track 2: But they are clearly portrayed as young people and not necessarily 18, I would say.

Speaker:

Track 2: And again, that is clearly a depiction of like an adult preying on a young person.

Speaker:

Track 2: An adult in power, specifically law enforcement.

Speaker:

Track 1: And the chef doesn't really care about that in any way.

Speaker:

Track 2: Doesn't care. No. I mean, well, it is made clear from one of the interactions

Speaker:

Track 2: that he has with Pedro Pascal that his department has historically been rife with problems.

Speaker:

Track 2: Corruption, excessive force, violence.

Speaker:

Track 1: The previous year may have raped Emma Stone.

Speaker:

Track 2: Maybe. I don't know. Like, I never, never seemed to me that Joaquin Phoenix's

Speaker:

Track 2: character was the one that did that.

Speaker:

Track 2: It always seemed, especially since the movie starts with him watching a video

Speaker:

Track 2: from somebody talking about how, like, what it's like to be,

Speaker:

Track 2: how you move past being in a relationship with somebody who doesn't want kids when you want kids.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yes.

Speaker:

Track 2: And he clearly wants kids, and she does not want kids, I would assume due to past trauma, though—,

Speaker:

Track 2: At the very end of the movie, she is pregnant and seems happy about it and we return to.

Speaker:

Track 2: So maybe it was Joaquin Phoenix. All that's really up in the air.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's hard to say, but clearly he was in love a third time.

Speaker:

Track 2: At the same time, the mother-in-law fucking hated him until she, you know.

Speaker:

Track 1: Could have used him as a pawn.

Speaker:

Track 2: Until she could use him, yeah. So like, I think it was the father.

Speaker:

Track 2: I think it was the father.

Speaker:

Track 1: That makes the most sense and perhaps why.

Speaker:

Track 1: That whole dynamic is crazy. But one thing that they did do well was the sort

Speaker:

Track 1: of interlaying of, you know, scrolling through Instagram and like the videos.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like they've really, as you said, like it's ahead of their time,

Speaker:

Track 1: but they depicted sort of the moment, the cultural moment of so many aspects of it.

Speaker:

Track 1: And, you know, you know, the lot of this, I will say like a lot of the script,

Speaker:

Track 1: I think, is actually pretty good.

Speaker:

Track 1: You know like the when when uh when the

Speaker:

Track 1: you know after george floyd and they're like having arguments

Speaker:

Track 1: in the sheriff's apartment of what happened those are the things that exactly

Speaker:

Track 1: what like a sheriff would say like i don't agree with the the force here but

Speaker:

Track 1: like we still have to maintain you know like law and order or whatever so it's

Speaker:

Track 1: yes it's the way the reaction of the police is exactly the reaction of the police then yeah.

Speaker:

Track 2: Especially like when you see them like show up at the quote-unquote protest

Speaker:

Track 2: it's like what there's like 20 people and they show and they're all like high

Speaker:

Track 2: school kids and they show up and they just start yelling and getting like,

Speaker:

Track 2: As someone who's been, like, the police always, always instigate,

Speaker:

Track 2: always incite violence and cause things to be more dangerous than they are.

Speaker:

Track 2: Because, let's be honest, there was, like, 20 fucking kids in the middle of

Speaker:

Track 2: a street. No one was driving down and heading to New Mexico.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, no one's outside. And they're like, you're disturbing.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, you didn't even know they were there.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, you didn't even know they were there, but you have to,

Speaker:

Track 2: as cops always do, show up and start swinging your dick around and being like,

Speaker:

Track 2: you know, if you don't listen to me, I'm going to throw a tantrum.

Speaker:

Track 2: And when I throw a tantrum, it involves arresting people or shooting them.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like if you would have just driven past and like waved and then fucking got

Speaker:

Track 2: on your merry way, nothing would have happened.

Speaker:

Track 1: They probably would have stopped protesting.

Speaker:

Track 2: It is the story of fucking cops in America.

Speaker:

Track 2: They accelerate and they incite violence and cause problems where they wouldn't otherwise exist.

Speaker:

Track 1: The other, um, there was something else that happened with that too. Um.

Speaker:

Track 2: When he, when there's the second protest, when he grabs the girl's phone?

Speaker:

Track 1: When, no, when they, during the protest too, one of the business owners is complaining

Speaker:

Track 1: that like there, there was a riot and like their store had been destroyed.

Speaker:

Track 1: And I would bet dollars to, I would bet a million dollars that he did that to his own shop.

Speaker:

Track 1: And it's like, oh, they did this. Or like, even so they threw like a thing through

Speaker:

Track 1: his window. Like that's it.

Speaker:

Track 2: That was, that wasn't, that was the second time.

Speaker:

Track 1: Oh, you're right. It was the second protest.

Speaker:

Track 2: The first time they were it was

Speaker:

Track 2: a residential road there was no business

Speaker:

Track 2: it's just a fucking like empty road and

Speaker:

Track 2: they're like you can't do this and it's like if you would have just fucking

Speaker:

Track 2: gone by like nothing would have happened like you everyone would have fucking

Speaker:

Track 2: these teenagers would have got on their way and nothing would have happened

Speaker:

Track 2: and they would have proven to be as exactly as effective as every one of these

Speaker:

Track 2: people are who just you know show up and And the real,

Speaker:

Track 2: and the second protest I really feel like is the one that is the most important one because we get the,

Speaker:

Track 2: oh, they caused this, this riot.

Speaker:

Track 2: And then at the end, after Joaquin Phoenix's character gets into it,

Speaker:

Track 2: that the young girl takes her phone and dies.

Speaker:

Track 2: You see that one guy start going, the violence makes me upset.

Speaker:

Track 2: Everybody, we're going to, we're going to stop doing everything.

Speaker:

Track 2: Everybody gets to your knees.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it very like, and again, like it comes down to this feels like,

Speaker:

Track 2: what is he saying? Is he saying peaceful protest is pointless?

Speaker:

Track 2: Is he saying you need violent protest?

Speaker:

Track 2: What is he saying here? Is who is he criticizing?

Speaker:

Track 1: Well, I would say that him saying that is like when the Democrats all kneeled

Speaker:

Track 1: in Congress, you know, and we're like, oh, we stand.

Speaker:

Track 1: It's hard to say whether he's saying that he agrees with that person or he's

Speaker:

Track 1: saying that this dummy thinks that we can just be like nonviolent and we'll

Speaker:

Track 1: be able to pick something. Yeah, it's unclear.

Speaker:

Track 2: Where are we coming from here? What are you trying to tell us?

Speaker:

Track 2: Are you saying peaceful protest is pointless?

Speaker:

Track 2: Because the way, you know, and it's like, again, we come down to,

Speaker:

Track 2: it's like, what the fuck are you doing?

Speaker:

Track 2: You may, I'm like, personally, I think that we have gone, we have proceeded past the point of.

Speaker:

Track 2: Peaceful protest being effective, personally.

Speaker:

Track 1: We have long past that.

Speaker:

Track 2: We're long past that point, and we are at the point where Kwame Ture said,

Speaker:

Track 2: you know, peaceful protest only works when your oppressor has a conscience,

Speaker:

Track 2: and our oppressors do not have consciousness.

Speaker:

Track 2: And yes, I do think peaceful protest has a part.

Speaker:

Track 2: It has a place and an overall strategy, but to completely and utterly dismiss

Speaker:

Track 2: it is to miss that point. And that's what he seems to be doing.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it's like, again, I return to what the fuck are you doing, man?

Speaker:

Track 2: You're making a movie that just comes off as just deeply cynical and just kind

Speaker:

Track 2: of like throw up your hands. Like all of them suck.

Speaker:

Track 2: Everybody sucks. The Democrats, the Republicans, the people in the streets,

Speaker:

Track 2: the people who, you know, the people that are talking about white identity and

Speaker:

Track 2: how it needs to be dismantled.

Speaker:

Track 2: Everybody, everybody sucks. Just pack it in. Just, you know, fucking.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah. So, so this is in the, in the Wikipedia where it's talking about like

Speaker:

Track 1: critical response to it.

Speaker:

Track 1: Some people refer to it. There was a couple of critiques or,

Speaker:

Track 1: or, you know, reviews of it that we're talking about as kind of like,

Speaker:

Track 1: it's like a Western with social commentary minus any moral compass.

Speaker:

Track 1: And in a way, I think that's actually an accurate portrayal of it is that like,

Speaker:

Track 1: yes, he's trying to create a social commentary about this moment in time of 2020,

Speaker:

Track 1: But there is no moral compass and there is no even attempt to create one or

Speaker:

Track 1: offer any alternative, you know, siding with everyone.

Speaker:

Track 1: Everyone is sort of like he's presenting all these different little things and

Speaker:

Track 1: saying, you guys go figure it out.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah, I just, I find that to be kind of pathetic.

Speaker:

Track 1: The guy from the UK, from the Times UK, wrote, The film seems unsure of what

Speaker:

Track 1: it wants to say, if anything, about its central subject.

Speaker:

Track 1: Aster pours over the quirks and waymarks of the pandemic, but leaves the actual

Speaker:

Track 1: business of drama and character notably undernourished.

Speaker:

Track 1: And I think that's actually a perfect description.

Speaker:

Track 2: That is, but then we come back to the notion.

Speaker:

Track 2: It's like, you know what, man? If you went anti-fascist, you're pro-fascist.

Speaker:

Track 2: You can't, you can't fucking, you can't make a movie where the central premise

Speaker:

Track 2: is about the struggle between, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: of people against oppressive state violence and they'd be like,

Speaker:

Track 2: But you know what? Just make the call on your own. It's like, fuck, man.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, you really, you can't come down on a side on this?

Speaker:

Track 1: Did you see Civil War that came out, I guess, like, what? Maybe it was two years ago now?

Speaker:

Track 2: No. No, I did not. Because as we discussed, I think it will just annoy me too much.

Speaker:

Track 1: So it's a very, I did an episode on that. It's a very similar kind of,

Speaker:

Track 1: I think that movie is more interesting and I liked it more.

Speaker:

Track 1: Maybe I have my problem with Alex Garland in some senses too,

Speaker:

Track 1: and his politics and his, you know, whatever, but it's a very kind of similar

Speaker:

Track 1: take where you kind of have this civil war, it's in the name.

Speaker:

Track 1: Uh but you don't all either you

Speaker:

Track 1: also don't get that real it's a

Speaker:

Track 1: like here's the thing that's happening i'm just going to kind of like

Speaker:

Track 1: throw it onto your plate and then like let you

Speaker:

Track 1: sort of figure it out and look i'm not

Speaker:

Track 1: saying that every director out there has to make a movie and tell us what he

Speaker:

Track 1: believes and create a message that's so obvious that everyone who watches it

Speaker:

Track 1: will see i don't think that's interesting but at least craft a movie where when

Speaker:

Track 1: you're when you are thinking about it it actually has something worth thinking about i.

Speaker:

Track 2: Just feel like have some moral backbone like

Speaker:

Track 2: you know what like fuck straight up now is not the time to be making movies

Speaker:

Track 2: where we're like which side is right on the mask mandate which side is right

Speaker:

Track 2: on on like you know the murder of george floyd which side is right on this now

Speaker:

Track 2: it's not the fucking time like straight up like which Which side is,

Speaker:

Track 2: is it right to sexually abuse and traffic children?

Speaker:

Track 2: Or, like, now is not the fucking time, man.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like, have some fucking backbone. Like, have a moral backbone and fucking portray, like, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: say something meaningful about what is happening in the world as fascism even

Speaker:

Track 2: further entrenches itself in the global superpower.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah yeah i especially given that as you said this movie came out in 20 may

Speaker:

Track 1: of 2025 wonder when they actually wrote the movie um it.

Speaker:

Track 2: Feels like centrist bullshit.

Speaker:

Track 1: They the movie was shot in august of

Speaker:

Track 1: 2023 in march of um let's

Speaker:

Track 1: see they're scouting in 23 they filmed the movie in

Speaker:

Track 1: march through may of 2024 in

Speaker:

Track 1: new mexico so by march and

Speaker:

Track 1: may of 2024 we had a pretty good idea of the resulting causes of covid and mass

Speaker:

Track 1: mandates and you know yeah they don't even really i guess i guess the vaccine

Speaker:

Track 1: was too the vaccine wasn't that wasn't out yet at this point but it.

Speaker:

Track 2: Wasn't out yet now well.

Speaker:

Track 1: It was just like a twinkle in our eye it was it was not for another eight or

Speaker:

Track 1: nine months after that that it came out.

Speaker:

Track 2: You know it makes me think of how you know years

Speaker:

Track 2: ago i took media training with um breakthrough news

Speaker:

Track 2: and at one point during said media training um the one of the people doing the

Speaker:

Track 2: media was guging per year uh people who are familiar who people were not familiar

Speaker:

Track 2: he's uh you know he's on breakthrough news which is a leftist you know a media outlet, um,

Speaker:

Track 2: explicitly like a Marxist media outlet.

Speaker:

Track 2: Um, and one of the things he points out is how, one of the things he pointed

Speaker:

Track 2: out is how, you know, media, mainstream media in America prides itself on being unbiased. Um.

Speaker:

Track 2: And we know that's bullshit, but the way it is presented as being unbiased actually

Speaker:

Track 2: allows them to present themselves as biased.

Speaker:

Track 2: Actually, what happens is they end up being biased for the status quo.

Speaker:

Track 2: You end up being biased for the state. You become biased for capital.

Speaker:

Track 2: And one of the points he makes is like, you know, as a leftist,

Speaker:

Track 2: as a Marxist journalist or a Marxist, you know, participating in journalism

Speaker:

Track 2: or producing journalistic material,

Speaker:

Track 2: yeah, we are biased. He's like, you know, like, we are biased.

Speaker:

Track 2: We are biased for the exploited, like in favor of the exploited and the oppressed.

Speaker:

Track 2: We are biased in favor of the working class. We are biased in favor of the oppressed

Speaker:

Track 2: and exploited people and against imperialism. imperialism and against capital.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it's like, this feels very much like the, like, I'm not being biased,

Speaker:

Track 2: I'm just presenting information.

Speaker:

Track 2: When you do that, you inevitably end up playing cover for fascism.

Speaker:

Track 2: You end up playing cover for the powers that be. And that's what this feels like.

Speaker:

Track 1: There was a period of time in my life where I listened to NPR all the time and

Speaker:

Track 1: i was under the belief the npr was like the one news station that was like pre,

Speaker:

Track 1: unbiased because like hey like it's publicly funded and

Speaker:

Track 1: you know they have this incentive to not be like cnn or

Speaker:

Track 1: not be like fox news but then you realize over time when you listen to their

Speaker:

Track 1: especially foreign policy it's oh who's the person giving us the information

Speaker:

Track 1: a source at the state department and who's the refuting person nobody and who's

Speaker:

Track 1: the person who paid for that ad during that commercial break? Lockheed Martin.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like, just to say there is no fair and unbiased media reporting in mainstream

Speaker:

Track 1: media. It does not exist.

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't know where I, I don't know. I feel like I lost the train of what you

Speaker:

Track 1: were saying, but I just went on a tangent there instead.

Speaker:

Track 2: Well, man, like it's, I mean, it's what, what you're saying is what, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: like you are citing a specific example of how, like when you are quote unquote

Speaker:

Track 2: unbiased in this system, what you

Speaker:

Track 2: are doing is performing in a way that is biased in favor of the system.

Speaker:

Track 2: That's what you're doing. And that's what this movie does, I think.

Speaker:

Track 2: And yes, could I watch this movie and be like, oh, this is a criticism of Joaquin Phoenix's character.

Speaker:

Track 2: He is clearly the villain. He fucking assassinated Pedro Pascal's character and his son.

Speaker:

Track 2: But you didn't make a movie just for deeply analytical, critical, Marxist fucking nerds.

Speaker:

Track 2: You made a movie for mass consumption.

Speaker:

Track 2: And when you make a movie or when you make anything, one of the things you're

Speaker:

Track 2: supposed to do is understand your audience.

Speaker:

Track 2: And does anyone listening to this, or do you, Evan, think the mass audience

Speaker:

Track 2: was going to walk away from this going, yes,

Speaker:

Track 2: that's correct.

Speaker:

Track 2: That we need a Marxist analysis. We need a dialectical analysis of things so

Speaker:

Track 2: we can understand how both sides play the system.

Speaker:

Track 2: Do we think that?

Speaker:

Track 1: I'm going to go with a hard no.

Speaker:

Track 2: I'm not trying to like, you know, I'm not trying to like, you know,

Speaker:

Track 2: denigrate American audiences. I'm being realistic.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean, to be fair and reasonable, and I think I too want this when I see some

Speaker:

Track 1: movies, movies are entertainment.

Speaker:

Track 1: They are something to be enjoyed or to talk about with your friends after you

Speaker:

Track 1: leave the movie or you talk about it on the podcast or you talk about it on

Speaker:

Track 1: Instagram, TikTok, or your parents or whatever.

Speaker:

Track 1: But at the same time movies that

Speaker:

Track 1: are doing something more than just being

Speaker:

Track 1: like oh it's this you know i'm trying

Speaker:

Track 1: to think of like a very you know the problem is that no movie is

Speaker:

Track 1: not political even if the goal wasn't to

Speaker:

Track 1: be that such you know marvel movies are political most disney movies

Speaker:

Track 1: are political in some way yeah the question

Speaker:

Track 1: is in a way

Speaker:

Track 1: it's almost like treating your audience with like disrespect sometimes and

Speaker:

Track 1: in this way I kind of think it goes that way like

Speaker:

Track 1: you're you're kind of telling your audience like don't think too deeply

Speaker:

Track 1: about this this is kind of just how it was and how it happened

Speaker:

Track 1: I don't know maybe Ari Aster wanted people to think about things more deeply

Speaker:

Track 1: but if he wanted that he should have made a better movie like I don't think

Speaker:

Track 1: it's a bad I don't think it's a bad movie I originally gave it three and a half

Speaker:

Track 1: stars in the letterbox I think I lean closer to three stars,

Speaker:

Track 1: if I'm being honest as I'm talking about it.

Speaker:

Track 1: So it's not a bad movie. It just has problems.

Speaker:

Track 2: I don't think it's a bad, like, again, I don't think it's a bad movie.

Speaker:

Track 2: I do think it is fucking like 20 years too early.

Speaker:

Track 2: Like this movie was made too soon to the actual events it is portraying.

Speaker:

Track 2: And it also, and I do stand by, like, you know, have some moral fucking Backbone,

Speaker:

Track 2: man, come down on the side and make it clear.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like, or if you're not going to come down on a side, at least,

Speaker:

Track 1: well, yeah, the thing that, the reason that I think that most movie directors

Speaker:

Track 1: don't do that, one is studio pressure,

Speaker:

Track 1: two, even if they wanted to do it, they don't push back enough on the studio

Speaker:

Track 1: to actually get what they want, and three, I think that they don't actually

Speaker:

Track 1: want to do that because they're making it for money.

Speaker:

Track 1: They're making, most directors want to make money from their movies so they can make more movies.

Speaker:

Track 1: And maybe at some point eventually they can make enough money where they can

Speaker:

Track 1: make the movie they really want to make. You know, we talked about this on Black Panther.

Speaker:

Track 1: Maybe Ryan Coogler made Black Panther so he can make enough money to make Sinners.

Speaker:

Track 1: And if you know what, if that's the case, good.

Speaker:

Track 1: He made Sinners. Good job. Thank you.

Speaker:

Track 2: This movie was produced by A24.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah. This was not produced by fucking Sony.

Speaker:

Track 2: This was not produced by Paramount. This is not.

Speaker:

Track 2: This is not a studio that has historically, you know, kind of like...

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah, you're right. But can I also say that there's a lot of critique I've heard

Speaker:

Track 1: about... I don't know enough about this to say exactly, but there are some folks

Speaker:

Track 1: who criticize A24 as kind of being the sort of private equity for moviemaking.

Speaker:

Track 2: True, true.

Speaker:

Track 1: But they are still letting these movies be made on a more creative basis than

Speaker:

Track 1: like Warner Brothers would.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah. Like.

Speaker:

Track 1: But your point is true. I mean, you're right.

Speaker:

Track 2: I mean, Civil War was made.

Speaker:

Track 1: A24, yeah.

Speaker:

Track 2: With A24. And Civil War, well, from what you're saying, I'm not, you know.

Speaker:

Track 2: But like the fact that it is you know less wishy-washy from what you said than

Speaker:

Track 2: this i feel like says something.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah maybe.

Speaker:

Track 2: I'm wrong i again i have not seen it so sometimes i like to spare my brain aggravation.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean those are movies i mean like i mean i

Speaker:

Track 1: if you're listening to this and you haven't seen eddington yet i would actually

Speaker:

Track 1: say you should still watch it while i don't think it was my favorite movie i've

Speaker:

Track 1: seen all year or will ever see for sure i think it's still worth watching in

Speaker:

Track 1: the sense that it at least if anything for the last 40 minutes of the movie,

Speaker:

Track 1: which are like pretty awesome you know i'll be you know that that part of the

Speaker:

Track 1: movie was great like they probably could have made this movie in two hours instead

Speaker:

Track 1: of two and a half and i'm not like i anti long movie guy you know fuck it if

Speaker:

Track 1: it's three hours and it's really good go for it But if it's three hours and it sucks.

Speaker:

Track 2: Dude, this movie is definitely longer than it needed to be.

Speaker:

Track 1: I just don't know why you needed as much setup as you did in the first, you know,

Speaker:

Track 1: part of it but.

Speaker:

Track 2: Anyway the only thing i can think of is like it very like accurately portrayed

Speaker:

Track 2: the way it felt during the pandemic of just time almost had no meaning.

Speaker:

Track 1: Time really did have no meaning i feel like the this the entire 2020 and even

Speaker:

Track 1: into most of 2021 kind of all felt like a fever dream yeah i think back to some

Speaker:

Track 1: of the like that it's a weird time for that's.

Speaker:

Track 2: The only thing i can think of.

Speaker:

Track 1: I mean not to say the fact that like what three million people died in between

Speaker:

Track 1: in America and abroad and mostly because of people like Joaquin Phoenix yeah

Speaker:

Track 1: uh yeah I don't know any uh any last uh thoughts on uh Eddington like.

Speaker:

Track 2: I said I think honestly the most the thing I kept coming back to is I just think

Speaker:

Track 2: this movie was it's it was made too soon.

Speaker:

Track 1: Too soon yeah like the whole meme like oh like you're saying something too soon

Speaker:

Track 1: well maybe this was in some ways it's almost positive that it was out sooner

Speaker:

Track 1: if only maybe that would lead other directors to make I don't know,

Speaker:

Track 1: I'd like to see a different director make a movie about that period of time

Speaker:

Track 1: maybe in a couple years from now but make a different movie.

Speaker:

Track 2: Yeah, and I also think that,

Speaker:

Track 2: The question of the sex, the child sex trafficking, I think, is—.

Speaker:

Track 1: Won't age well.

Speaker:

Track 2: Won't age well. It already didn't age well.

Speaker:

Track 2: And the fact that it comes off as being dismissive in this movie,

Speaker:

Track 2: and for someone involved in Hollywood to do that feels questionable at best.

Speaker:

Track 1: I wouldn't say when I was watching it, I was brushing past that,

Speaker:

Track 1: but I was sort of like, my thought was like, why does this need to be in the movie?

Speaker:

Track 1: Like, that was another 20 minutes that they easily could have just like not had.

Speaker:

Track 1: Like, it doesn't necessarily, I guess it's-

Speaker:

Track 2: It felt like it needed to be there because it was like, I want to capture everything of 20.

Speaker:

Track 1: Yeah, yeah, I guess that's true.

Speaker:

Track 2: It's like, well, you know what? If you can't do this incredibly fucking important,

Speaker:

Track 2: deep, like, if you can't do this subject justice, you should not fucking include it.

Speaker:

Track 1: That's fair uh i don't i have nothing left that

Speaker:

Track 1: i think i can say i will say that if you want

Speaker:

Track 1: to hear the discussion on the movie civil war we discussed it's episode 121

Speaker:

Track 1: you can just search at left of the projector.com for that episode i thought

Speaker:

Track 1: it was a good conversation about that movie and sort of the problems with it

Speaker:

Track 1: as well but um for bill and myself um you've been listening to left of the projector

Speaker:

Track 1: and we'll catch you next time catch.

Speaker:

Track 2: You next time folks.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Left of the Projector
Left of the Projector
Film discussion from the left