Episode 268
Nightcrawler (2014)
Left of the Projector Links
Left of the Projector on Letterboxd
Left of the Projector on Instagram
Left of the Projector on Patreon
Left of the Projector on Threadless
Host Links
Transcript
Track 1: Hello, and welcome to Left of the Projector. I'm your host, Bill,
Speaker:Track 1: back again with another film discussion from the West. If you'd like to support
Speaker:Track 1: the show for as little as $3 a month, you can go to Patreon,
Speaker:Track 1: forward slash Left of the Projector pod.
Speaker:Track 1: If you like the dress and style, we've got shirts, and at leftoftheprojectorpod.threadless.com,
Speaker:Track 1: show everyone you got the best taste around.
Speaker:Track 1: Wherever you're listening, give us a rating and subscribe so you'll get notified
Speaker:Track 1: of our weekly episodes that drop every Tuesday. Now, on to the show.
Speaker:Track 2: This week on Left of the Projector, we'll be discussing the 2014 film Nightcrawler,
Speaker:Track 2: It was directed by Dan Gilroy and stars Jake Gyllenhaal, Rene Russo,
Speaker:Track 2: Riz Ahmed, and the late, great Bill Paxton.
Speaker:Track 2: Despite coming out 12 years ago, it honestly could have been released today
Speaker:Track 2: with some guys with fancy cameras or just a smartphone.
Speaker:Track 2: Tonight, it's just me and Evan. How you doing, Evan?
Speaker:Track 2: Doing all right. How are you? I'm doing okay. Did I mispronounce Jake's name?
Speaker:Track 2: His last name? i can never remember
Speaker:Track 2: which i think it's i think it's it's chilling all it is it's all right,
Speaker:Track 2: jake if you want to come on the podcast i will i will personally apologize for
Speaker:Track 2: mispronouncing your name on multiple occasions despite having been told otherwise by my wife,
Speaker:Track 2: in particular i think this is the third film with jake,
Speaker:Track 2: we've done i know we did donnie dropco but i think there's a third one maybe i did a long time ago,
Speaker:Track 2: not remembering it but uh you saw this movie for the very first time yes yes i did i'm surprised,
Speaker:Track 2: i really enjoyed it uh i thought it was really good uh and jake gyllenhaal is,
Speaker:Track 2: an impressive act you know i kept thinking about this i was like this is.
Speaker:Track 2: This is like i don't know like another take on like american psycho Like, it...
Speaker:Track 2: It reminded me of american psycho so much interesting better i think.
Speaker:Track 2: Better see why do you say it's similar to america oh why do you think it's similar to american psycho,
Speaker:Track 2: it's the same kind of wrong just following an obvious sociopath,
Speaker:Track 2: but whereas american psycho is meant and is is really more satirical this is
Speaker:Track 2: more like a straight condemnation there's no satire in this this is just,
Speaker:Track 2: this is a hit piece on sociopaths and you know paparazzi which.
Speaker:Track 2: I i kind of appreciate the i appreciate the purity of that it's like no this
Speaker:Track 2: he's a bad person this is a person,
Speaker:Track 2: you should not like him yeah so for people who don't know dan gilroy has a brother
Speaker:Track 2: named coney gilroy who happens to do a little known show called andor,
Speaker:Track 2: apparently they co-wrote part of the script together which i didn't know until
Speaker:Track 2: i was looking into it just briefly he was actually nominated for an oscar for
Speaker:Track 2: this for the best original screenplay,
Speaker:Track 2: and i think it's a crime that Jake Gyllenhaal didn't get a nomination for Best Actor.
Speaker:Track 2: A hundred percent. I really think it's, I don't think he gets enough credit
Speaker:Track 2: just in general. This movie was really, really good, and he was impressive in it.
Speaker:Track 2: Now, Wikipedia does call it a satire.
Speaker:Track 2: I don't think this is tongue-in-cheek enough to be counted as a satire.
Speaker:Track 2: This is not subtle enough to be a satire, in my opinion.
Speaker:Track 2: I have a very good satire radar, and I wouldn't call this movie...
Speaker:Track 2: I don't think it's a satire, but,
Speaker:Track 2: all the interviews I read with Gilroy, he did not make it seem like a satire.
Speaker:Track 2: He actually calls the role played by Jake Gyllenhaal, Lou, as an antihero.
Speaker:Track 2: And he was specifically writing it that way where you don't have a backstory on him.
Speaker:Track 2: You don't really root for him, but you do see like this journey where like,
Speaker:Track 2: maybe if you like, you're like, you're a real big capitalist fan,
Speaker:Track 2: you might like be like, go Lou, take him down or whatever.
Speaker:Track 2: But like.
Speaker:Track 2: I find that amazing because to me,
Speaker:Track 2: he seems so obviously like unlikely to ever, ever achieve that,
Speaker:Track 2: that it's more like a hit on the idea of bootstraps.
Speaker:Track 2: Like there's like, no, you're not going to do it. It doesn't matter. Like,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, like nobody, that's not, it's not a thing, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: it seems so obvious to me that he's never actually going to get to that point
Speaker:Track 2: of that kind of create like capitalist success.
Speaker:Track 2: No no but i mean i guess you could argue you don't really know what he's come
Speaker:Track 2: from you know he's likely abused comes from like,
Speaker:Track 2: you know probably lived most of his life in who knows what,
Speaker:Track 2: but i mean he did go from literally nothing to basically you know buying a computer
Speaker:Track 2: researching online all of these like the way he talks and everything about him
Speaker:Track 2: which we'll i think talk about is that it's very like robotic and,
Speaker:Track 2: sociopathic and all of this but he does make a lot of himself from nothing not
Speaker:Track 2: he's not a capitalist of course but,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah but it's not like.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, he did. By stealing, he stole a bunch of stuff first.
Speaker:Track 2: He didn't invent a better mousetrap. He stole stuff.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, a capitalist who didn't steal someone's labor. Well,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah, for us, we're like, yeah, that makes sense.
Speaker:Track 2: But like, anybody who's trying to paint him as like an anti-hero or an example
Speaker:Track 2: of that capital, like in like a positive frame, it's like, you're admitting,
Speaker:Track 2: you're giving away the game.
Speaker:Track 2: Well, I want to read, I know we like, sometimes we don't need to get to this
Speaker:Track 2: slowly, but I want to read these two quotes from Gilroy, which I think are bizarre.
Speaker:Track 2: And it's another one of those things, just like Richard Kelly,
Speaker:Track 2: who directed Donnie Darko, and you should go listen to that episode,
Speaker:Track 2: where we posited as a group that if richard kelly the director of van darko
Speaker:Track 2: had read theory he would have a much better understanding of the world and probably
Speaker:Track 2: be able to make a better movie or at least a more interesting movie,
Speaker:Track 2: so this is what he says the idea of the character who has implied back snow
Speaker:Track 2: i'm gonna skip that part he says um.
Speaker:Track 2: And in his desperate loneliness and probably raging insanity the precepts of
Speaker:Track 2: capitalism become a religion to him.
Speaker:Track 2: If you only had one direction to climb, which is up, then to have a goal would give sanity.
Speaker:Track 2: I imagine he started Sauer, discovered the internet for self-health,
Speaker:Track 2: Maxims, blah, blah, blah. And then the second thing is that the movie is about,
Speaker:Track 2: quote, the spirit, the perpetual spirit of poverty.
Speaker:Track 2: I don't know another system other than capitalism, maybe some mixed socialism thing.
Speaker:Track 2: I wouldn't want to hazard what a better system was, but I think we're entering
Speaker:Track 2: into this period of hyper-free market capitalism has become very much like the
Speaker:Track 2: jungle, in which it's acceptable that the weak perish at the hands of the strong,
Speaker:Track 2: and that's what this is supposed to be.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, we're just getting there, huh? We're just getting there.
Speaker:Track 2: We just got there in 2014?
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, and the funniest part of
Speaker:Track 2: that was I wouldn't want to hazard what a better system was. Yeah, yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: I just, I'm not, I'm not going to just like, I'm not going to throw any ideas
Speaker:Track 2: out there, you know, but like, I mean, this is what we got right now,
Speaker:Track 2: right? And just in 2014, just getting to the part where you're just like,
Speaker:Track 2: we're just fucking people over.
Speaker:Track 2: It is possible and i i probably think this about his brother too especially
Speaker:Track 2: with a lot of the and or stuff is that maybe he holds back a little to what
Speaker:Track 2: he maybe really believes,
Speaker:Track 2: and it's funny the interview is actually pretty funny because the interviewer
Speaker:Track 2: kept asking these kind of questions in really stupid ways and he's like no this
Speaker:Track 2: is capitalism like the interviewer just like didn't
Speaker:Track 2: didn't they tried to change the narrative of his movie a little bit and he just
Speaker:Track 2: was like no shut the fuck up man,
Speaker:Track 2: i just think i mean he clearly gets it enough to make a pretty interesting and actually great film,
Speaker:Track 2: i mean straight up this is a great film i gave this five stars on letterbox,
Speaker:Track 2: i jake jill and all should have at least been nominated for an oscar i i looking at the list
Speaker:Track 2: of the leading actor role for that year was eddie redmayne won for the theory
Speaker:Track 2: of everything which i actually haven't seen so i can't say that but i think
Speaker:Track 2: he deserved it over bradley cooper and American Sniper.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, yeah. Michael Keaton was really good in Birdman. Benedict Cumberbatch was
Speaker:Track 2: pretty good in the Imitation Game, even if that movie kind of sucks.
Speaker:Track 2: And then you had Steve Carell in Foxcatcher, which I did not see,
Speaker:Track 2: so I can't say whether he was good or not.
Speaker:Track 2: But I don't know, man. I feel like he dominated this movie. He crushed it. All right.
Speaker:Track 2: I do think that he should have at least been nominated.
Speaker:Track 2: And I have never seen the entirety of Foxcatcher, but I have seen like significant
Speaker:Track 2: portions of it and you can't, you don't recognize Steve Corral.
Speaker:Track 2: He's really good in it. Okay. Yes. Okay. So incredible. I wouldn't say he wasn't. I just don't know.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh yeah, I know. I know. I'm just saying like from a physical perspective,
Speaker:Track 2: but he has like a huge physical transformation, but also like his portrayal, he's unrecognizable.
Speaker:Track 2: It's, it's actually, it's absolutely incredible.
Speaker:Track 2: To the point where like, I know it's Steve Carell. And every time I see,
Speaker:Track 2: I'm like, I don't believe it. And I have to like, I really question like my reality.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, and the only Oscar nominee that he has ever received was for,
Speaker:Track 2: I know what it is, it's Brokeback Mountain, and he probably should have won that.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. And looking at his list of movies he's been in, it's just shocking to
Speaker:Track 2: me that he hasn't been nominated more than once.
Speaker:Track 2: It strikes me as one of those things, I don't remember which actor that we were
Speaker:Track 2: talking about another time, that is always really good, but just never gets any.
Speaker:Track 2: Yes, yes.
Speaker:Track 2: And I think actually Dano, what's his name?
Speaker:Track 2: Paul Dano also is another one of those cases where he's always,
Speaker:Track 2: he's really good in so many movies and they just, I feel like they just aren't
Speaker:Track 2: liked. I don't know what it is.
Speaker:Track 2: They gotta be like 50 before they get a chance.
Speaker:Track 2: And oddly enough, both of them were in a movie together in Okja.
Speaker:Track 2: Anyway. I mean. We've straight off topic. Tarantino does say that Paul Dano
Speaker:Track 2: is one of the worst actors he's ever worked with. And that he almost destroyed,
Speaker:Track 2: There Will Be Blood. Destroyed it by making it much better.
Speaker:Track 2: The only reason he is bad in that movie is if you compare him to Daniel Day-Lewis,
Speaker:Track 2: which is like impossible.
Speaker:Track 2: It's like it's like having the greatest actor ever with just a great actor and
Speaker:Track 2: you're like yeah it sucks and actually what happens is you compare them to daniel's
Speaker:Track 2: daily listen you're like holy shit they got both of these guys in one movie holy shit,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah that's impressive yeah that's a lot of acting to fit in one movie yeah
Speaker:Track 2: and you can go back and listen to episode 214 on there will be blood.
Speaker:Track 2: Just to throw that in there. But we should talk about the actual movie,
Speaker:Track 2: and I'll give a brief synopsis of it just for anyone who hasn't seen it,
Speaker:Track 2: and I would urge anyone to see this movie.
Speaker:Track 2: It takes place in Los Angeles at the time, 2014, where this guy Lou,
Speaker:Track 2: who is played by Jake Gyllenhaal, is first, he initially is like stealing a
Speaker:Track 2: bunch of basically cable and metal to make some money outside.
Speaker:Track 2: Copper wire as well. But he still has other things too.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. He still has a manhole cover. Manhole covers.
Speaker:Track 2: And he's doing this you know just to make some money and he's he gives like
Speaker:Track 2: a whole this big speech about like wanting to get a job from the foreman and the foreman basically,
Speaker:Track 2: you just stole a bunch of shit and are selling it to me and you're asking for
Speaker:Track 2: a job he tells him to fuck off and when he's driving home he stops at a car crash where there's,
Speaker:Track 2: bill paxton character filming the scene which and they call them stringers basically
Speaker:Track 2: people who are freelance videographers of car crashes and crime scenes to the cell to,
Speaker:Track 2: news studios so they can use it as footage and of course because of the way
Speaker:Track 2: his character is which is,
Speaker:Track 2: he sees something and he just wants to be or become that he decides that he's going to,
Speaker:Track 2: he steals a bicycle for more money to get a camcorder and basically he's now
Speaker:Track 2: decided he is going to be better than bill paxton's character i think his name is joe nothing you know,
Speaker:Track 2: and basically the rest of the film is just his transformation,
Speaker:Track 2: you watch him just become more insane, more psychotic as he takes this on and...
Speaker:Track 2: Now, the one thing also that I do think is relevant, the synopsis of this film
Speaker:Track 2: and like the general, like if you look up the description of it,
Speaker:Track 2: it always includes the fact that he begins to stage the things that he is shooting.
Speaker:Track 2: And while, yes, he does manipulate a couple of the, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: like one, maybe two of the crime scenes, it is not.
Speaker:Track 2: But I think that the claim that he stages them being so prominent in the description,
Speaker:Track 2: the marketing for the film is actually a disservice to the film overall.
Speaker:Track 2: The marketing thing they did to try and sell it?
Speaker:Track 2: Well, he stages the stuff. I just don't think, I didn't see it as integral to it, really.
Speaker:Track 2: Wait, is that in the trailer? Is that what they try and promote it as?
Speaker:Track 2: It is if you look up the synopsis for synopsis of nightcrawler it always says you know that he um,
Speaker:Track 2: begins to stage you know the he does a couple of times in the film but i don't really feel like that,
Speaker:Track 2: if anything in my mind the way he stages it is creating a narrative around it
Speaker:Track 2: alongside the media to make the well we,
Speaker:Track 2: but i don't think that's a big part of it either i don't like i do also think
Speaker:Track 2: that i didn't look at the official you know synopsis but that's kind of bullshit,
Speaker:Track 2: i don't i.
Speaker:Track 2: I actually, I think that one of the most important elements,
Speaker:Track 2: if we're going to like go through this, like if we go through this chronologically,
Speaker:Track 2: I think that actually one of the first and most telling points,
Speaker:Track 2: of like this movie is actually the way the,
Speaker:Track 2: foreman of the construction site or the, uh, the scrapyard,
Speaker:Track 2: um, how that guy snubs him in response to his like self health,
Speaker:Track 2: self help pitch bullshit.
Speaker:Track 2: And his capitalist kind of like lingo.
Speaker:Track 2: And I feel like that says a lot because it's like that's a guy that like he does work for a living.
Speaker:Track 2: Like this is a guy, he works for a living and he has no time for this like bullshit language.
Speaker:Track 2: He's like, no, I have like actual work to do, not, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: buying into the bullshit language of the capitalist system.
Speaker:Track 2: He's like get the fuck out of here like i have an actual job to do i don't have time for this like.
Speaker:Track 2: Nonsense that you know you're trying to push that does work later he doesn't
Speaker:Track 2: give the same impassioned speech but that does work on the,
Speaker:Track 2: other main character in this film which is played by renee russo who is nina
Speaker:Track 2: who works as a producer for what is it channel doesn't make it channel six key double a key wla six
Speaker:Track 2: for for like a low and not a low end but like not a top,
Speaker:Track 2: news station and like that kind of talk makes her interested because that's
Speaker:Track 2: the same way that she thinks in in maybe not the same psychotic terms,
Speaker:Track 2: it's not also see how crazy he is in that opening scene.
Speaker:Track 2: It's not even that he's not it's not a top station it's also a like a it's a like a bottom time slot.
Speaker:Track 2: She's like- Yeah, the late night, maybe early morning at best.
Speaker:Track 2: One thing I wrote down in my notes that I, so I'll preface this by saying, I am not autistic.
Speaker:Track 2: There are times in the movie where the way he described what he did almost sounded
Speaker:Track 2: like someone who was autistic, but might also be a psychopath.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, I did, I explicitly read it as being like sociopathic, like coded.
Speaker:Track 2: Makes more sense. very much and like that ties into the like uh also like,
Speaker:Track 2: i there are other very and i am also not autistic but i according to the thing
Speaker:Track 2: you know like there's there are.
Speaker:Track 2: Key elements that especially in movie language that you would use to you know
Speaker:Track 2: and the fact of the matter is is that If we're going to use the common language of film,
Speaker:Track 2: the way he behaves is very much more sociopathic and not autistic,
Speaker:Track 2: especially in the fact that,
Speaker:Track 2: he does not break eye contact.
Speaker:Track 2: He maintains eye contact with people who are his prey, essentially.
Speaker:Track 2: He is attempting to prey on these people. He locks eyes at them because he knows
Speaker:Track 2: that's a way to manipulate people.
Speaker:Track 2: He locks eyes with them, maintains eye contact, and then says those things.
Speaker:Track 2: And he pushes those very specific you know like buttons it comes off as robotic because.
Speaker:Track 2: That's how psychopaths sound. Because he's not feeling the emotion.
Speaker:Track 2: He is just going through the motions because he knows that's a way to manipulate
Speaker:Track 2: people. That's all it is. Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. I mean, the way he reads something online, he researches it, and then basically just,
Speaker:Track 2: if everything is like a script, it's like, oh, if I do this,
Speaker:Track 2: or if I, you know, especially later when he brings on an intern which i feel so bad for rick man oh man,
Speaker:Track 2: he gets just screwed but rick played by uh what's his name um riz Ahmed,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah uh riz Ahmed who was great in this movie he is treated the same way you expect like a,
Speaker:Track 2: mid-level manager type to treat you know the bottom rung employee in like a
Speaker:Track 2: meaningless soulless corporation but he's just a guy trying to make it and he's
Speaker:Track 2: still because what he read,
Speaker:Track 2: trying to make it he's homeless he's not trying i mean i meant that no no i
Speaker:Track 2: meant that um that jake jill and i was trying to make it as a company oh he's
Speaker:Track 2: treating this guy like like an absolute pile of trash dude lives in a garage,
Speaker:Track 2: He shows up for what he thinks is an interview, and at the end is told,
Speaker:Track 2: oh wait, no, this is an unpaid internship.
Speaker:Track 2: That hasn't changed since 2014. Right. Everything about this,
Speaker:Track 2: like, I don't understand.
Speaker:Track 2: You have to be, I don't understand how you could say that he is an anti-hero.
Speaker:Track 2: Like either, either you agree with the capitalist mindset and like the,
Speaker:Track 2: the, the notions and the underlying ideology of the system, then he's not,
Speaker:Track 2: he's not an anti-hero. He's a hero.
Speaker:Track 2: Or you disagree with it and he's a fucking villain.
Speaker:Track 2: I don't really see how you can look at this and not just view him as a villain the whole time.
Speaker:Track 2: If you believe in the capitalistic ideology, then yeah, he's a hero.
Speaker:Track 2: There are people who, because what keeps coming back to, what kept striking me about this,
Speaker:Track 2: there's a lot to talk about from like.
Speaker:Track 2: So, like, we both grew up in, like, the 90s, largely.
Speaker:Track 2: And what is, like, one thing, 90s and early 2000s, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: like, those are, like, our formative years, I'd say, right?
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. And what was, like, one thing that, like, in the 90s became so much more
Speaker:Track 2: visible in mainstream U.S. media that was, like, a huge, almost, like, issue?
Speaker:Track 2: Paparazzi. Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: And like, that's what this felt like to me that this was very explicitly placed
Speaker:Track 2: in LA because, and it's like, it's a comparison.
Speaker:Track 2: I can't, I couldn't help but keep drawing comparisons between the way paparazzi
Speaker:Track 2: were accurately depicted, especially during the nineties and the early,
Speaker:Track 2: early two thousands and the way they victimized and prayed on people and got
Speaker:Track 2: in their faces and agitated.
Speaker:Track 2: Them so that they could get things and that's all this was and it's like the
Speaker:Track 2: only difference is is that this was.
Speaker:Track 2: I couldn't help but see those comparisons be like oh no this it also came across
Speaker:Track 2: to me like it's a hit on paparazzi it's like
Speaker:Track 2: look look the you think it's a good thing what he's doing to these people
Speaker:Track 2: like that's what you're doing to those people as well you're invading their
Speaker:Track 2: personal lives you're invading their personal space you're marketing everything
Speaker:Track 2: about their lives, so you can turn a buck.
Speaker:Track 2: You're preying on people and victimizing them and damaging them, so you can turn a buck.
Speaker:Track 2: It's like, what's the difference between these two things? What's the difference
Speaker:Track 2: between hounding Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan, or until they have a mental breakdown, or...
Speaker:Track 2: Getting up in the face of this poor man who was just shot in an attempted carjacking
Speaker:Track 2: or this person who just had a car accident.
Speaker:Track 2: In the end, we have to recognize that you are both contributing to the denigration
Speaker:Track 2: and dehumanization of people for your profit.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah and then meanwhile well the other thing that i was in i thought you might
Speaker:Track 2: have said also that was very prevalent,
Speaker:Track 2: in the 90s and i feel like late 80s early 90s i know this is 2014 so clearly
Speaker:Track 2: i don't i haven't watched a local news channel,
Speaker:Track 2: in yeah in in so long so i don't know what it's like anymore i'm sure it's pretty similar,
Speaker:Track 2: but i saw something that's i mean i think in the movie they mentioned how many,
Speaker:Track 2: i know jake john hall i mentioned in this in at some point when he's talking
Speaker:Track 2: to nina like how what percentage of the newscast is devoted to politics local
Speaker:Track 2: government actual news and the what percentage is dedicated to,
Speaker:Track 2: crime and it's overwhelmingly related to crime by like 90 of it or something
Speaker:Track 2: i can need to find the exact um,
Speaker:Track 2: the quote from it but i remember very vividly it's on 80 um shit i can't find
Speaker:Track 2: it i'll find it at some point i'm pretty sure they mentioned it.
Speaker:Track 2: The point is, in the 90s, I just remember true crime and crime statistics and
Speaker:Track 2: black-on-black crime, you know, crime creeping into the suburbs,
Speaker:Track 2: which is a big thing in this movie,
Speaker:Track 2: that Renee Russo talks about, is she wants stories where a black person or a
Speaker:Track 2: brown person or some minority commits a crime against a white person in a rich neighborhood.
Speaker:Track 2: Because that makes rich people and white people scared and then makes them watch the news.
Speaker:Track 2: And that's literally the goal of her channel and why she continues to get by
Speaker:Track 2: the videos from Jake Gyllenhaal because he keeps finding and getting really
Speaker:Track 2: good footage of these types of crimes.
Speaker:Track 2: In the middle of that, he does go inside a house that had been shot up and moves
Speaker:Track 2: a picture and gets weird photos. He moves a body.
Speaker:Track 2: So he definitely does things that are more unethical than his existing regular job.
Speaker:Track 2: But the time that this came out, I'm surprised that it was still a thing.
Speaker:Track 2: It almost makes me feel like it's the 90s when you watch it, actually.
Speaker:Track 2: It does feel like the 90s. It does feel like the 90s.
Speaker:Track 2: But I think part of that has to do with, I mean, this is going to sound kind
Speaker:Track 2: of wild, But part of that feels like the fact that like basically economically
Speaker:Track 2: depressed locations and economically people,
Speaker:Track 2: who live in economically depressed areas off, they are inevitably left behind
Speaker:Track 2: by certain things because they cannot afford to participate in them.
Speaker:Track 2: His car, his car is fucking from like, well, the car he starts with is like,
Speaker:Track 2: fuck, I think it might be an old Pinto. So it's very old.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I thought I was going to say it's like nothing has really
Speaker:Track 2: changed other than the rich people are now richer and the people who are poorer.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, the, the time, I mean, the technology they're using was very much the,
Speaker:Track 2: of the time. I mean, the, the cameras that Bill Paxton's group has,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, initially are like pretty high tech.
Speaker:Track 2: This had been the nineties. I mean, you're talking, I mean, he uses a camera
Speaker:Track 2: in the beginning. It's like a camcorder from the nineties.
Speaker:Track 2: And he is the low man on the totem pole he is poor in comparison to bill paxton's
Speaker:Track 2: character yeah bill paxton,
Speaker:Track 2: goes out of his way to make fun of his camera he's like nice camera
Speaker:Track 2: yeah well i mean this is the move the film does take place in current like in
Speaker:Track 2: 2014 yeah they have smartphones that's what i'm saying like bill paxton has
Speaker:Track 2: better cameras because he has economic privilege.
Speaker:Track 2: He is not behind the time. He is not existing in a previous economic time period,
Speaker:Track 2: because he is forced to be.
Speaker:Track 2: The other thing that struck me about this is,
Speaker:Track 2: The fact.
Speaker:Track 2: That, and I don't know, maybe it was just me, but did it look to you as if,
Speaker:Track 2: it was filmed with a very subtle sepia tone filter, very similar to the way,
Speaker:Track 2: many American directors will typically film for Latin American countries?
Speaker:Track 2: It did look like that. It wasn't as pronounced. And I think because so much
Speaker:Track 2: of the movie takes place at night. I mean, how many scenes are there during the day? Only a couple.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, not a lot. But, you know, when they're inside with lights,
Speaker:Track 2: but overall, and it really felt like to me, it's like, look,
Speaker:Track 2: you almost, it felt like a commentary on the way that filter is used.
Speaker:Track 2: You want to cast these other countries in this light. Well, guess what?
Speaker:Track 2: You are, you know, America and its system and the way it treats people is no
Speaker:Track 2: better than what you claim these and how you portray these other places,
Speaker:Track 2: which are victims of American exceptionalism, imperialism, and all that stuff.
Speaker:Track 2: And to cast LA in that light to me was a very interesting and interesting.
Speaker:Track 2: It actually makes even more sense. So the film, the cinematographer was Robert
Speaker:Track 2: Ellsworth and he did a bunch of the early Paul Thomas Anderson movies,
Speaker:Track 2: including I'm pretty sure there will be blood.
Speaker:Track 2: So it comes back to that, but I could totally see, cause a lot of those movies
Speaker:Track 2: and some of these other ones I see he's done.
Speaker:Track 2: He did eight millimeter, which is a really fucked up movie, Jesus Christ.
Speaker:Track 2: But a bunch of these movies though, where there is a very clear tonal element
Speaker:Track 2: to them in the cinematography. So I would highly buy the fact that they used it.
Speaker:Track 2: And they also use light in such a cool way because at night,
Speaker:Track 2: the only real lights you have are from streetlights, cars, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: buildings, but everything was lit in a way that like, didn't feel wrong.
Speaker:Track 2: No not at all like you you saw only what you kind of wanted to see in the same
Speaker:Track 2: way that you only see what the stringer you know bill paxton general is trying
Speaker:Track 2: to show you we've talked about the,
Speaker:Track 2: inability or poor filming at night in films before and this felt like.
Speaker:Track 2: This is this is one of the few movies i can point and be like that feels like
Speaker:Track 2: it was actually filmed at night in a city and that's what it looks like,
Speaker:Track 2: where it's like all the light was provided by background streetlights or the
Speaker:Track 2: lights shining from like open businesses.
Speaker:Track 2: And unless they were in those businesses or directly beneath the streetlight,
Speaker:Track 2: you were getting the ambient glow of light just enough to see by just like in real life.
Speaker:Track 2: It felt very natural.
Speaker:Track 2: Says in the in the wikipedia page about the filming is he says,
Speaker:Track 2: gyllenhaal well so john hall's animalistic approach to the script influenced
Speaker:Track 2: his belief that this idea was almost like a wildlife documentary,
Speaker:Track 2: and then he says to achieve this he used a wide angle lens with a depth of field
Speaker:Track 2: and avoided like soft spoke it's like a soft focus we bring the landscape so
Speaker:Track 2: it makes perfect sense especially with all that darkness i mean,
Speaker:Track 2: it does look pretty amazing i I mean, I feel the movie made a lot of money.
Speaker:Track 2: It made $50 million, but sometimes I feel like that when I talk to people about
Speaker:Track 2: this movie, they're like, oh,
Speaker:Track 2: I either haven't heard of it or like they don't know it or I don't know.
Speaker:Track 2: This movie deserves more. It definitely does.
Speaker:Track 2: The only thing that this movie, my immediate thought was it brought me back
Speaker:Track 2: to Monsters and the photojournalist in that and how he talks about it.
Speaker:Track 2: He's like, the only way I put food on my table is if I send a picture of a dead kid.
Speaker:Track 2: And it's like the difference between the two characters because it's like that
Speaker:Track 2: guy you know he still had some like internal moral compass some kind of like standards,
Speaker:Track 2: and you could see that at a certain point if that is the demands put on you
Speaker:Track 2: by the system you will do whatever is necessary, if that includes,
Speaker:Track 2: staging a crime,
Speaker:Track 2: staging a scene for a photo, or for a video shot, or, I mean,
Speaker:Track 2: essentially setting up a shooting.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, that's what he does with those guys and the cops. He essentially,
Speaker:Track 2: he sets up a shooting so he can film it.
Speaker:Track 2: That's what happens. Yeah, I mean, all of the...
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, he's straight up. He essentially murders Riz Ahmed's character.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, I mean, if you were, if he were to have been caught,
Speaker:Track 2: it would have been accessory to murder or maybe not accessory.
Speaker:Track 2: I don't know the something. I mean, well, he would have been completely fucking
Speaker:Track 2: with holding evidence of the police. I mean, he did a lot of crimes,
Speaker:Track 2: a lot of crimes, lots of crimes.
Speaker:Track 2: I i think except like the he knew,
Speaker:Track 2: he was going to get shot and intended to have him get shot well he knew it too
Speaker:Track 2: because he's like you saw that guy there and you didn't say anything and he
Speaker:Track 2: intended to have it happen because because,
Speaker:Track 2: rick pushed back on him and basically and showed him that he had bargaining power.
Speaker:Track 2: And it's like a boss in a union.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, you're going to have bargaining power? Nah, sorry. I'm going to shut the
Speaker:Track 2: factory down. You could all go starve to death.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, I mean, to piece the picture, things escalate throughout the film where
Speaker:Track 2: he's finding more and more videos, he's making more money, he becomes more into
Speaker:Track 2: Nina, Renee Russo, and- Does he, though?
Speaker:Track 2: Or does he realize that she is a pressure point? Is he into her?
Speaker:Track 2: I mean... No, no, he's into her. Well, I guess it's more that he's into her
Speaker:Track 2: power and the fact that he can use it to his advantage.
Speaker:Track 2: And which is also for people who don't know, Rene Russo is married to Dan Gilroy
Speaker:Track 2: and he wrote the character for her to be in the movie.
Speaker:Track 2: This is like one of the last movies. She hasn't done a whole lot of movies as
Speaker:Track 2: of late, which is a shame. I would divorce him after that. That's fucked up.
Speaker:Track 2: That's fucked up well I hope he asked first he wrote her a role in which she
Speaker:Track 2: is basically blackmailed for sex.
Speaker:Track 2: Well, but also you, I mean, also her job before that is also quite unethical.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, let me read this one quote and then I'm going to paint the picture of
Speaker:Track 2: like what, like the, the, the first half of the movie or the,
Speaker:Track 2: maybe the first two thirds is really him becoming this stringer.
Speaker:Track 2: He brings on the his his intern riz ahmed who he's basically,
Speaker:Track 2: drives around with and uses him to just give him directions like he has a phone
Speaker:Track 2: he knows la he gets him from place to place and yells at him whenever he makes a mistake,
Speaker:Track 2: but one of the things that renee russo says early in the movie when she's talking
Speaker:Track 2: about one of the films that she videos he brings he says,
Speaker:Track 2: tie it in with the carjacking last month in glendale and the other one in van
Speaker:Track 2: palms when was that march it's the carjacking crime wave.
Speaker:Track 2: That's the banner. And then later she says, we find our viewers are more interested
Speaker:Track 2: in urban crime creeping into the suburbs.
Speaker:Track 2: What that means is victim or victims, preferably well-off and or white,
Speaker:Track 2: injured at the hands of the poor or a minority.
Speaker:Track 2: So that is, I mentioned that before, but that's basically.
Speaker:Track 2: The mode of operations for the news station is find crime committed by poor
Speaker:Track 2: minorities against the unsuspecting rich white people.
Speaker:Track 2: And we will put it on TV and create this. And one thing I had a question about
Speaker:Track 2: is do you think the cops are,
Speaker:Track 2: do anything or say anything or get mad with the fact that they basically are
Speaker:Track 2: manufacturing crime waves or is that good for cops that there's lots more crime,
Speaker:Track 2: because that means they just have it's definitely good for cops i mean.
Speaker:Track 2: They manufacture crime waves so yeah that's true okay so they're one in the
Speaker:Track 2: same but basically what ends up happening is that jake jill and hall pretty
Speaker:Track 2: much accidentally ends up at a crime scene of a shooting
Speaker:Track 2: in a rich neighborhood and they see the people leaving with their guns into an escalade.
Speaker:Track 2: He hides in the bushes. He films it. He films the car, the license plate.
Speaker:Track 2: And then he goes inside the house and films three people who have been shot,
Speaker:Track 2: like a cleaning woman. And then I guess a husband and wife.
Speaker:Track 2: There's also the really weird moment where he goes into a child's room with
Speaker:Track 2: a crib, but there's no baby inside.
Speaker:Track 2: He films the whole thing and goes scene and basically offers it for just what, like 20 grand.
Speaker:Track 2: I think he says 50 he gets down to i don't know like 17 000 some insane amount
Speaker:Track 2: of money he realizes the power he has and he and this is sort of like what happens
Speaker:Track 2: in the last third of the movie is,
Speaker:Track 2: he he withholds the evidence of knowing who it is so he can then,
Speaker:Track 2: attract or follow that person then send the police after them to create a gunfight
Speaker:Track 2: which he could then also film and also sell,
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: And I can't begin to describe how fucked up it is. This is also. The police are onto him.
Speaker:Track 2: This, that is also the scene when he sells this, that is the scene in which
Speaker:Track 2: he plays his hand completely.
Speaker:Track 2: And if the, and this is the point at which if you think that he is a hero,
Speaker:Track 2: if you think that anything he does is like you still,
Speaker:Track 2: Again, anti-hero, the word anti-hero has meaning, and he does not qualify to
Speaker:Track 2: be the punisher is the classic anti-hero.
Speaker:Track 2: And it's not the definition of an anti-hero is a person who does things that are,
Speaker:Track 2: subjectively good or, you know, positive for society, but in ways that are bad.
Speaker:Track 2: In no way is anything that Gyllenhaal's character does,
Speaker:Track 2: good for society or any way moral in no way and this scene when he sells this
Speaker:Track 2: is the point which really,
Speaker:Track 2: solidifies everything about him which is that,
Speaker:Track 2: she is arguing with him for the money because he asked for a lot more than $50,000
Speaker:Track 2: originally I believe he asked for almost like $200,000 I think like something
Speaker:Track 2: insanely, something, something insanely high.
Speaker:Track 2: And she's like, I'm not doing that. And he basically at that point is like, he uses the.
Speaker:Track 2: He uses her job and he basically says, he's like, you're going to give me what
Speaker:Track 2: I want because I have control of your job.
Speaker:Track 2: And one of the things I want is I want to fuck and I want you to do,
Speaker:Track 2: because he literally says, he's like, I want you to do what I say,
Speaker:Track 2: including in the bedroom or something along those lines.
Speaker:Track 2: He is a reprehensible human being
Speaker:Track 2: in no way, shape or form. Is he an anti-hero? Nothing he does is good.
Speaker:Track 2: And then we, then we go on from there. It's all downhill.
Speaker:Track 2: So this is the three supposed factors that make an antihero.
Speaker:Track 2: The first is that the antihero is doomed to fail before the adventure begins.
Speaker:Track 2: I wouldn't even say that necessarily. No. Number two, the blame of that failure
Speaker:Track 2: on everyone but themselves, which really isn't, well, that one a little bit.
Speaker:Track 2: He does blame rick for like failures but generally he almost sometimes he several
Speaker:Track 2: times i feel like he says he blames himself when he comes to rick and then third
Speaker:Track 2: is i think the most important is they offer a critique of social moral and reality,
Speaker:Track 2: the only way you could argue that is if this movie was really more of a satire and you're,
Speaker:Track 2: sort of you could sort of argue that he's showing the moral failings,
Speaker:Track 2: of news media.
Speaker:Track 2: And this is a stretch.
Speaker:Track 2: It's just not enough of a satire. Starship Troopers, satire.
Speaker:Track 2: Nightcrawler, not a satire enough.
Speaker:Track 2: So.
Speaker:Track 2: So it was 50 grand. He offers 50 grand. I think he ends up getting like 17.5 or something like that.
Speaker:Track 2: And he also, and also Nina, Rene Russo's character is constantly arguing with
Speaker:Track 2: another guy at the station who actually does seem to have morals,
Speaker:Track 2: but is basically talked out of everything because she is his superior and not
Speaker:Track 2: to mention the fact that their ratings need to be picked up and she has no choice
Speaker:Track 2: but to follow his demands.
Speaker:Track 2: And he also threatens to get her fired because, you know, like,
Speaker:Track 2: if I don't give you this, I know about rating sweep and all this nonsense.
Speaker:Track 2: And so he does research to be able to use it against her. And it's. Oh, yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. He invites her. He pressures her into a dinner date.
Speaker:Track 2: And then at that dinner date starts basically revealing all this personal information
Speaker:Track 2: that he has learned about her through research.
Speaker:Track 2: I also love i have to say one thing when they go to the mexican restaurant he's
Speaker:Track 2: like do you like mexican food and he goes cabanita has been called an authentic taste of mexico city,
Speaker:Track 2: most evenings there's live music but on saturdays classic mexican films are
Speaker:Track 2: shown do you want to go with me i think it would be fun if we went together
Speaker:Track 2: like the way he reads that it's like copy for an ad
Speaker:Track 2: it's really funny because he probably he probably did read that He probably
Speaker:Track 2: read three-quarters of that from an ad,
Speaker:Track 2: or like a review on the local paper.
Speaker:Track 2: He went to Yelp and is like finding the review. A hundred percent.
Speaker:Track 2: But the other thing also, the way that Nina is treated is honestly,
Speaker:Track 2: I was thinking about this, I think my note that I wrote down was that it's almost
Speaker:Track 2: like the way that women are treated in Hollywood.
Speaker:Track 2: So you could maybe make an argument that the way that she is pushed around and
Speaker:Track 2: blackmailed is probably very similar to the way that women in any kind of position of,
Speaker:Track 2: moderate power are treated or just like lowest rung people.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, yeah. I mean, he says specifically that there's a timeline to which she leaves jobs.
Speaker:Track 2: And I don't think that's a coincidence that she is a woman and she.
Speaker:Track 2: Has found it difficult to remain in a male in a jobs in male dominated areas past a certain point.
Speaker:Track 2: For whatever reason that may be. I don't find it to be a coincidence.
Speaker:Track 2: She's not staying in these places? Oh, not really shocking.
Speaker:Track 2: God, nobody knows what she puts up with.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, oh yeah, I'm sure, like her superiors. I mean, she does seem kind of like
Speaker:Track 2: the top dog in it is, you know, the only time she's ever challenged is by her legal team.
Speaker:Track 2: She's the top dog and the lowest thing.
Speaker:Track 2: She is also the perfect demonstration of the oppressed seek to wear the boot.
Speaker:Track 2: And that's something that I keep coming, the notion that people think that morals
Speaker:Track 2: are some kind of like universal code.
Speaker:Track 2: It's like it's passed down from, it's written to the DNA of the stars.
Speaker:Track 2: It's either behave one way or you don't. in many, you know, a lot of these things
Speaker:Track 2: can, are dictated by material conditions.
Speaker:Track 2: What you will do to survive.
Speaker:Track 2: Is flexible, dependent upon your material conditions.
Speaker:Track 2: And if you are of a lower and oppressed people, an oppressed class, an oppressed group,
Speaker:Track 2: there are going to be things that you may be forced into doing that you would
Speaker:Track 2: not have done otherwise.
Speaker:Track 2: But because your material conditions have forced certain things upon you,
Speaker:Track 2: certain hardships, but you still need to do things like eat and put food on
Speaker:Track 2: a roof over your head or medicine.
Speaker:Track 2: And she has very different conditions as opposed to the people above her.
Speaker:Track 2: And also the man who constantly pushes back on her because it is far less likely
Speaker:Track 2: that he is going to get fired than her.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah and what i'm about to say is that riz ahmed enters the chat where he is
Speaker:Track 2: literally i mean initially i think she he offers him 50,
Speaker:Track 2: dollars per day or maybe less 30 30 and then later he gets up to 50 and then
Speaker:Track 2: like he keeps being like oh like when is it going to be my you know performance
Speaker:Track 2: review which is so fucking weird to be like you're in a performance review,
Speaker:Track 2: from this lunatic you drive around in a car with all night this fucking bat shit crazy person.
Speaker:Track 2: And he knows that he's making money because he trades in his really i don't
Speaker:Track 2: remember what car he has the beginning but he buys like a dodge charger which
Speaker:Track 2: i don't think it's like super expensive but it's clearly a new car i'm sure he like,
Speaker:Track 2: i have no idea it's probably i'm gonna guess 32.5,
Speaker:Track 2: You're looking it up? What year was that? 2014? Yeah, I'm looking it up.
Speaker:Track 2: I wonder how much the Dodge Charger in 2014 cost. I'm going to guess $32,500 is my guess.
Speaker:Track 2: Well, if I look up for... It's showing you used ones probably,
Speaker:Track 2: right? Yeah, it's showing you used ones.
Speaker:Track 2: Well, you know what? A used 2014 Dodge Charger.
Speaker:Track 2: Can sell for close to like 18 grand.
Speaker:Track 2: Dodge Chargers were a pricey car that came out. Okay.
Speaker:Track 2: So whatever it was, he had an, but the point being is that he knows,
Speaker:Track 2: Rick knows he's making money and he's getting screwed.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, he, a bunch of times under his breath, it's like, I'm living in a garage,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, he's, he's barely making money to eat.
Speaker:Track 2: He had to take what, three buses to get to where he, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: to get to the quote unquote interview.
Speaker:Track 2: You uh and the the things the moral failings that,
Speaker:Track 2: jake jill hall says is mostly like the guy isn't confident enough and you know
Speaker:Track 2: i think he still would have screwed him over it doesn't really make much difference
Speaker:Track 2: what he would have said he's taking advantages of him because he can and that's
Speaker:Track 2: what he's read in books that,
Speaker:Track 2: the the leader of a company can exploit the labor of those under him and there's
Speaker:Track 2: nothing you can do about it and if you want to leave then leave but he knows
Speaker:Track 2: this guy's desperate and he'll do it,
Speaker:Track 2: and the more and more things get fucked up the more he realizes that it's compromising
Speaker:Track 2: his morals and at a point he's tells says he's gonna leave,
Speaker:Track 2: unless he gives him part of the money that he's making with this new,
Speaker:Track 2: you know this new the filming of this like the reward money he's gonna get which
Speaker:Track 2: also i don't really understand how he was gonna get the reward money.
Speaker:Track 2: Once they realized i think he was lying well of course of course but i mean
Speaker:Track 2: he might have gotten 30 grand for the video okay i found it yeah the the car
Speaker:Track 2: was 28,735 on the base model,
Speaker:Track 2: okay i actually like to you i do i do have commentary on the car but i want
Speaker:Track 2: to talk about rick for one second please i think you have it's such a great
Speaker:Track 2: point that you make that he,
Speaker:Track 2: starts to push back and realizes it's crossing lines because while yes,
Speaker:Track 2: it is true that your material conditions can dictate certain things or not dictate,
Speaker:Track 2: but put pressure upon certain things,
Speaker:Track 2: there is still, you still,
Speaker:Track 2: I think that Rick is also an excellent example of a character who,
Speaker:Track 2: that acknowledges that reality while also saying, you still have personal choice.
Speaker:Track 2: You still have personal power. You still have the ability to refuse certain
Speaker:Track 2: things that will cross moral lines.
Speaker:Track 2: That you can make that choice even if it harms you materially.
Speaker:Track 2: Rick's character is truly like, he is...
Speaker:Track 2: The representation of a victim of the capitalist system and somebody who.
Speaker:Track 2: Maintains their, even as they are constantly buffeted by that system and put
Speaker:Track 2: into positions that are dangerous, harmful, but also morally,
Speaker:Track 2: not even great, morally bad, still be able to maintain personal integrity.
Speaker:Track 2: And you could see within him, he's saying, I don't want to be part of this.
Speaker:Track 2: And it is easy to assume it is, it is to think once he has the chance,
Speaker:Track 2: he's going to leave this for something that is better and that he doesn't feel
Speaker:Track 2: like a shitty person for doing.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. Yeah. Agreed. I mean, like I was saying, it's like, you feel so bad for
Speaker:Track 2: him because he's doing this because he really can't get any other job.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, we don't know what other jobs he's tried to get, but presumably he left
Speaker:Track 2: things out. Maybe he's been in prison. We don't know.
Speaker:Track 2: He hasn't worked a job over the table, so he can't go somewhere and,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, actually have an interview.
Speaker:Track 2: But he's doing this. I don't know how long he's doing this. It's not clear.
Speaker:Track 2: Like, beginning of the movie to when Rick starts to when, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: the end of the movie, but presumably several months at least. Could be longer.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean he's making nothing nothing yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah and in the end when in when they film the two of them so the like the culmination
Speaker:Track 2: of this as you mentioned before is so they
Speaker:Track 2: he now figures out the license plate or where the person lives who committed
Speaker:Track 2: that triple murder because he had the license by the whole time
Speaker:Track 2: which he lied to the cops about he then follows them to a diner or some restaurant,
Speaker:Track 2: he sees one of them actually does have a gun,
Speaker:Track 2: they they want to film it so he forces rick to film it from different angles
Speaker:Track 2: and then he calls the police to say he found them he also gives his real name
Speaker:Track 2: which i thought was pretty fucking stupid and his explanation later is nonsensical,
Speaker:Track 2: like oh i happened to see this guy outside my window and then i followed him
Speaker:Track 2: all day it's like sure you did buddy that in in la you saw the same guy twice and.
Speaker:Track 2: And they're filming it, and of course, the police escalate the situation,
Speaker:Track 2: and there's a huge shootout, a bunch of people die.
Speaker:Track 2: They follow them through the streets, and like, probably the coolest scene in
Speaker:Track 2: the whole movie. That car chase scene is fucking awesome.
Speaker:Track 2: And it ends up being like an accident they get out of the car to try and follow
Speaker:Track 2: them and then rick gets shot by the guy one of the original murderers because,
Speaker:Track 2: jake general hall lies to him to say like come over and shoot it from over here
Speaker:Track 2: and he's actually just in the car just injured but not dead and then he shoots
Speaker:Track 2: him point blank then he fucking films him dying which is,
Speaker:Track 2: also i feel like feel like in his mind he's a capitalist even if he isn't one
Speaker:Track 2: because he's like fully transformed into like not just enjoying the suffering
Speaker:Track 2: of others but enjoying the suffering of like someone he might have,
Speaker:Track 2: potentially considered a quote-unquote friend or an employee lets them die and
Speaker:Track 2: then of course he sells the footage back to nina and now he's like more of a
Speaker:Track 2: big wig at the company the very last scene is
Speaker:Track 2: him having two other vans and like three other employees and he's like uh giving
Speaker:Track 2: them the you know the big speech to be part of his corporation or you know company,
Speaker:Track 2: which has the dumbest fucking name by the way.
Speaker:Track 2: It does it's a terrible name oh man what was it called um fuck news media group
Speaker:Track 2: or something like that it's even worse than that.
Speaker:Track 2: It was really funny really bad in the script it actually has like a logo of it no um fuck,
Speaker:Track 2: we're going to edit this and I'm going to put it in where I knew it immediately,
Speaker:Track 2: wasn't it called like.
Speaker:Track 2: Do one of the funniest things too is when they,
Speaker:Track 2: as i'm trying to remember what it's called as they're um showing the triple
Speaker:Track 2: murder on the television like live,
Speaker:Track 2: they're coaching the news anchors through it and they have to several times
Speaker:Track 2: part of this his demands is that they need like they several times name his company through it,
Speaker:Track 2: you know which we have forgot,
Speaker:Track 2: which we have forgot And, but also more importantly, like,
Speaker:Track 2: the relevance of that, like, I feel like is so important because it's like the
Speaker:Track 2: idea, it's like the, the news, like they are manufacturing things.
Speaker:Track 2: They are actively coaching these people to make it, to sensationalize it,
Speaker:Track 2: to make it feel, to make it different and to fit their narrative,
Speaker:Track 2: which we find out is blatantly not true because the narrative that they have gone with is that.
Speaker:Track 2: It's like you said, it's, it's, um, crime moving into richer areas.
Speaker:Track 2: But we find out that this was, they had, the people in that house had drugs
Speaker:Track 2: and the people that robbed them were drug dealers.
Speaker:Track 2: So it was really more of a drug deal gone wrong. It wasn't like,
Speaker:Track 2: this was not an outside push.
Speaker:Track 2: This was them inviting criminal elements into their lives for their own edification.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah yeah like they're when she's when when the anchors are doing the story
Speaker:Track 2: she's saying in their ears like keep repeating that it's graphic hit it again
Speaker:Track 2: and then they like go through it again and says you know that make sure you
Speaker:Track 2: say that they're on the loose they're escaped
Speaker:Track 2: and of course the news anchors like do it in a much more eloquent way and they
Speaker:Track 2: repeat it and then they tell you where it's from,
Speaker:Track 2: and then they're showing you you know the vicious attack vicious you know um,
Speaker:Track 2: innocent And they just keep building the tension of this.
Speaker:Track 2: And then it becomes a story on every news channel.
Speaker:Track 2: And of course, I mean, this is the way that they, this is exactly what they
Speaker:Track 2: would do in real life, you know, and then at that time, and probably today,
Speaker:Track 2: the way that they talk about crime.
Speaker:Track 2: And yeah, it's the whole entire thing wasn't at all what they thought it was.
Speaker:Track 2: No one was, I mean, yes, these people, the housekeeper was an innocent person,
Speaker:Track 2: but the two people in the house were, you know, dealing pounds of drugs and
Speaker:Track 2: it went bad and they get fucking shot.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, you shouldn't have done that.
Speaker:Track 2: Video okay i got it well i was wrong it was he asked for a hundred grand to start,
Speaker:Track 2: okay it is then she goes 75 then she counters with 5 000 the name of his company
Speaker:Track 2: is uh video production news.
Speaker:Track 2: I'm so cheesy i believe it a news media corporation i believe in news media
Speaker:Track 2: no no no no i know it's a news gathering yes i'm sorry it's a news gathering
Speaker:Track 2: organization okay also it's,
Speaker:Track 2: not it's not a charger it's a dutch challenger um and it is relevant 2014,
Speaker:Track 2: is actually relevant because dutch challenger in 2014,
Speaker:Track 2: a new performance package was released called the super sport group and they
Speaker:Track 2: the whole thing was like they basically the challenger in 2014 was a time in which they really
Speaker:Track 2: pushed this idea that like the challenger is a,
Speaker:Track 2: like it's a muscle like it is a muscle car they were like revamping that and
Speaker:Track 2: it became one of those vehicles that like among certain people it's like a challenger
Speaker:Track 2: was their attempt it was like the attempt to make the challenger on par with like the mustang gt,
Speaker:Track 2: and like that midlife crisis car.
Speaker:Track 2: No offense to my father, who has driven... MSRP 30,000 495. That was pretty close.
Speaker:Track 2: Even though I was thinking of the wrong car. The Challenger is actually,
Speaker:Track 2: and I believe if I remember correctly, the Challenger is one of the cars that,
Speaker:Track 2: alongside the Charger, many...
Speaker:Track 2: Police precincts modified into stinger cars or not stinger cars um,
Speaker:Track 2: undercover fucking traffic car i'm not a big car guy but i have to say it's
Speaker:Track 2: a pretty sweet looking car it's it's a very classic muscle car look i'm not
Speaker:Track 2: a big car guy but i grew up with my father you're obvious my my father is a huge car guy,
Speaker:Track 2: so i grew up around all this and it is a very classic muscle car um.
Speaker:Track 2: And he you know there's many scenes in this that really cater to,
Speaker:Track 2: that kind of like mentality and that kind of like egotistic and that ego driven
Speaker:Track 2: need to have the big muscle car,
Speaker:Track 2: early on early on very early in the film you will see after he robs after he
Speaker:Track 2: steals the stuff and then sells it and steals the watch from the security guard who he beats up.
Speaker:Track 2: They actually, they point out like that. These are like, it's all aspirational,
Speaker:Track 2: because he drives by a car lot and a car showroom. And right there on the car
Speaker:Track 2: showroom is multiple muscle cars, including a Dodge Challenger.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. I mean, this is one of the things too, where he probably,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, read what car, you know, everything he says, he like,
Speaker:Track 2: he's like going to the computer a lot and read a lot.
Speaker:Track 2: And yeah, I mean, looking at the Wikipedia for the Dodge Challenger,
Speaker:Track 2: it was most popular from 69 to 74. That was like the peak of it.
Speaker:Track 2: And then it was gone until the 70s and then gone again.
Speaker:Track 2: And they brought it back in 2008. But it does seem like the mid 2012 to 14 was
Speaker:Track 2: like the peak of the newer version of that.
Speaker:Track 2: I'm sure someone listening that loves cars is going to be like,
Speaker:Track 2: actually, it was in 2012.
Speaker:Track 2: I'm sorry, car people. I don't know, Jack. It's close enough.
Speaker:Track 2: The 100th anniversary edition came out in 2014.
Speaker:Track 2: Okay, well then there you go. That was like a huge thing. It's a huge thing.
Speaker:Track 2: And that is when they introduced the Hemi engine into it. And it was a huge
Speaker:Track 2: marketing push because they put a Hemi into it. And that's a super powerful engine.
Speaker:Track 2: Ward could probably speak to this better, but I remember the marketing for the
Speaker:Track 2: 100th anniversary Dodge Challenger with a Hemi.
Speaker:Track 2: This was peak machismo, buy a car bullshit.
Speaker:Track 2: And his character perfectly embodies that kind of like.
Speaker:Track 2: Keeping up with the Joneses, present this facade, this exterior,
Speaker:Track 2: rich, successful, I'm a man, I get the woman I want, blah, blah,
Speaker:Track 2: blah, blah, blah, all that bullshit.
Speaker:Track 2: Don't forget, he had this plant they would often water, so he does care about
Speaker:Track 2: people. Yes, yes. He cares about that plant more than he cares about his employee. Yes.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, I mean, yeah, I mean, some of this, there's lots of scenes too,
Speaker:Track 2: and the thing we also want to add too is that.
Speaker:Track 2: His competition, Bell Paxton's character, has a more successful,
Speaker:Track 2: they have multiple vans.
Speaker:Track 2: He actually asks Jake Gyllenhaal to join him to run one of the vans.
Speaker:Track 2: And he's so insulted by this. What does he do?
Speaker:Track 2: He cuts his brakes, presumably, in his van that leads him to have a crash and die.
Speaker:Track 2: Well, we don't see him die. We don't know he dies. But he's really fucked up.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. He's very, very gravely injured. They take him out. He is bloodied and...
Speaker:Track 2: He looks over at Jake Gyllenhaal. I get the sense that he knew. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: It's very well to... It also felt like Jake Gyllenhaal was because they're at
Speaker:Track 2: the scene, and he makes it a point to get as close as possible and film him
Speaker:Track 2: as he's going into the ambulance,
Speaker:Track 2: which to me read very much like a threat it's like an acknowledgement on gyllenhaal's
Speaker:Track 2: part like yeah i did this to you and i'll i'll take it to the next level if you keep yeah,
Speaker:Track 2: i mean one of the things you said you said in the beginning is that this movie could come out,
Speaker:Track 2: today and i was trying to think part of my thought about that is i mean now,
Speaker:Track 2: the difference is i mean maybe i want to amending that because now the average
Speaker:Track 2: person does not watch these news channels, especially anyone under the age of
Speaker:Track 2: probably 50, unless you're forced to.
Speaker:Track 2: Maybe I'm wrong, but people in their 20s and 30s are not watching local news.
Speaker:Track 2: You're right, but they don't have to to make this be now because this is not
Speaker:Track 2: a question of whether this is a question of people doing things to go viral,
Speaker:Track 2: staging things and doing things because we know for a fact that they do do that,
Speaker:Track 2: i guess also these new stations do have tiktok channels where they probably post the shit too,
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, yeah, viral, but going viral, making up fake things.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, more of the point, like, it's actually exacerbated, because now we have
Speaker:Track 2: farmed out everything is.
Speaker:Track 2: It used to be the only people who had the notion of, if it bleeds,
Speaker:Track 2: it leads, was the newspaper.
Speaker:Track 2: Because they're the only people that had the means to produce something and
Speaker:Track 2: distribute it that would have meaning.
Speaker:Track 2: Now I got this phone in my pocket that I can film anything I want whenever I want.
Speaker:Track 2: And if I film something good enough.
Speaker:Track 2: I can get, I can make it. Yeah. The difference, I mean, the same as this is,
Speaker:Track 2: the difference is the amount of people who go viral and are like these social
Speaker:Track 2: media people that actually can make a living is like minuscule.
Speaker:Track 2: Right. But it's more to the point, but at the same time, the true power of that
Speaker:Track 2: in this system is not that there are people that can make money off of it.
Speaker:Track 2: The true power of that is that there used to be a fraction of a fraction of
Speaker:Track 2: a fraction of the percent of the population that had the means, motive, and desire to do,
Speaker:Track 2: what Gyllenhaal or Joe or Rick or the newscasters do, which is sell parts of
Speaker:Track 2: their very soul and their humanity.
Speaker:Track 2: Give it away burn it up by denying the humanity of victims of crimes purely
Speaker:Track 2: so that they can make a buck and now,
Speaker:Track 2: through a system of having of social media and the constant influx of that We
Speaker:Track 2: have now, our society has created an entire portions of generations,
Speaker:Track 2: that have made that bargain with themselves.
Speaker:Track 2: I will film strangers in public.
Speaker:Track 2: Mock them and shame them because it might it might make it might get viral and
Speaker:Track 2: then maybe i can i can get something out of that i mean isn't that how,
Speaker:Track 2: isn't i mean i don't know i don't follow mr beast before he was a million multi-millionaire
Speaker:Track 2: no idea what mr beast did i mean he was the youtuber from the beginning i mean,
Speaker:Track 2: the youtube channels like his that can become that big partly is luck but also
Speaker:Track 2: partly is they have the willingness to do to debase themselves,
Speaker:Track 2: and same way that dick gyllenhaal does i mean maybe not doing the same thing,
Speaker:Track 2: but they're doing something that's fucked up that they know right,
Speaker:Track 2: we come to the same question of what is violence.
Speaker:Track 2: Right what is violence is violence purely the act of shooting someone or is
Speaker:Track 2: violence The participation in,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, is starving someone or is violence the act of, you know,
Speaker:Track 2: actively encouraging and contributing to the dehumanization of another person for your profit?
Speaker:Track 2: What is violence? All of these things are violent.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. Violence exists because of the system that perpetuates it. Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: And we have a system now, but more to the point, we have a media apparatus that
Speaker:Track 2: is so freeform and so accessible by anybody, though most of those people are
Speaker:Track 2: not actually profiting from it, and you aren't still the product, as we all know.
Speaker:Track 2: But it leads people to commit violence against themselves and debase themselves
Speaker:Track 2: and alienate create alienation within themselves purely for the purpose of taking
Speaker:Track 2: advantage of other people at their most vulnerable so that they can film it and put it online.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah and it's funny like in this in this the,
Speaker:Track 2: acab includes a police officer in this however it would have been nice if they
Speaker:Track 2: were able to nab him for actually withholding evidence because she knew exactly
Speaker:Track 2: what he did oh yeah but there was no way they could prove it,
Speaker:Track 2: and so they couldn't plus he's also white so he's honestly that's like also part of it like he's not,
Speaker:Track 2: as smart as he thinks he is no his his his his cover story was completely nonsense,
Speaker:Track 2: makes no sense he saw the car outside his window because he thought they were
Speaker:Track 2: following him and then later he sees the same car and follows it.
Speaker:Track 2: Okay. Yeah. But like even a cop could put two to do together and be like,
Speaker:Track 2: oh yeah, obviously he has more information. It doesn't take a genius to figure out.
Speaker:Track 2: He's not. He is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is.
Speaker:Track 2: The only reason he is not caught is because they are basically tied.
Speaker:Track 2: It's bureaucratic hand tied. That's all it is.
Speaker:Track 2: It's because they have no actual.
Speaker:Track 2: There's no way to actually get anything, and it's all on, like,
Speaker:Track 2: you know, drives, unless they can, like, really come up with some excuse to,
Speaker:Track 2: like, get into his hard drives.
Speaker:Track 2: They, you know, they can't just look through his, they can't look through his
Speaker:Track 2: door and be like, we think we see a gun. Presumably, he would have been smart
Speaker:Track 2: enough to delete the footage where he filmed the license plate.
Speaker:Track 2: But again, he's not as, you know, he thinks he's so smart that that's usually
Speaker:Track 2: when you get, you do dumb shit.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean maybe this is a sequel one day where he's on trial what's that maybe
Speaker:Track 2: this is a sequel one day and he's on trial the fall of Lewis Bloom,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah he becomes the thing it's so funny though when he he like becomes he's
Speaker:Track 2: walking around the news studio he knows you know the film,
Speaker:Track 2: the newscaster is by voice really more than anything more than even money he seems to just want,
Speaker:Track 2: recognition and to be looked at i mean we didn't say this before but he's also an incel,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah yeah with the way he treats the way he treats nina definitely the the expectation
Speaker:Track 2: of of everything i mean yeah i don't know man this movie is this movie is is
Speaker:Track 2: so good incredibly layered,
Speaker:Track 2: i give it as i said i gave it five out of five stars deserved you know so I
Speaker:Track 2: didn't realize this he was nominated Gyllenhaal for a BAFTA award and Golden Globe but he did not win.
Speaker:Track 2: And it does say that people considered him not getting the Oscar nomination.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah, major snub. He was considered a snub. Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: Which it was. I mean, I don't...
Speaker:Track 2: There are some movies of his I need to see because pretty much every time I
Speaker:Track 2: see him in a movie, I'm like, damn, dude.
Speaker:Track 2: You are a good actor.
Speaker:Track 2: Although i don't know that i'm going to watch the movies that were made by i
Speaker:Track 2: think if we talked about this i really want to watch enemy but i really hate
Speaker:Track 2: dennis villanova and so i just don't think i can watch it,
Speaker:Track 2: i think he plays two characters i think he might play like twin brothers.
Speaker:Track 2: That's supposed to be good i think you're just gonna have to get over your hatred,
Speaker:Track 2: I will not do that but I might still watch I watch movies from directors I don't like all the time I know,
Speaker:Track 2: so I mean anytime anytime you watch a Quentin Tarantino movie you're like fuck
Speaker:Track 2: man I gotta watch this yeah I hate that I like some of his movies,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah I mean and honestly it shocks me that he made Jackie Brown despite being like,
Speaker:Track 2: such a person who wants to use racist terms so badly and like wishes he was black and.
Speaker:Track 2: But Jackie Brown, Dan. Gyllenhaal lost out against the same person in the BAFTA.
Speaker:Track 2: He lost. Oh, really? Who was it? Eddie Redmayne won for Theory of M.I.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, yeah. I mean, consensus was that that was a really good movie.
Speaker:Track 2: I'm looking at some of the recent movies he's been in. He was in the remake
Speaker:Track 2: of Roadhouse, which doesn't look as good, but he's in a lot of good stuff.
Speaker:Track 2: But yeah, Renee Russo only, I think she did I think five more movies after this,
Speaker:Track 2: last movie she was in was 2019 I wouldn't call her retired though I would call
Speaker:Track 2: it they don't want to be have someone who's 70 years old be in their movie,
Speaker:Track 2: yeah probably was her last movie Endgame yes it was,
Speaker:Track 2: what a low point to end on that is such a shame she's been in such some she
Speaker:Track 2: didn't to me she's been in less movies than I thought she's been in, honestly.
Speaker:Track 2: You should watch Tin Cup. We'd have this discussion. I'm not going to watch
Speaker:Track 2: that movie. I'm not going to watch that movie.
Speaker:Track 2: It's not going to happen. You won't watch it again because you won't.
Speaker:Track 2: Yeah. I also love the movie Get Shorty, which I actually just watched a couple
Speaker:Track 2: of days ago again for the third time in a while.
Speaker:Track 2: I'd feel it all the time. Yeah, she was in Frankenstein D, the intern,
Speaker:Track 2: just getting started, Velvet Buzzsaw, which was also the same cinematographer
Speaker:Track 2: as Nightcrawler and Avengers Endgame.
Speaker:Track 2: And that was the last thing she was in.
Speaker:Track 2: I mean, I could be wrong. Maybe I haven't read any interviews.
Speaker:Track 2: Maybe she just didn't do a bunch of movies at that point. She just wasn't.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, and Philip Buzza also was Gilroy and Jolene Hall. I forgot Jolene Hall was in there too.
Speaker:Track 2: Oh, interesting. And Toni Collette. I wonder if that movie's any good.
Speaker:Track 2: It's supposed to be very good. Sure.
Speaker:Track 2: Interesting. I don't even know what it's about.
Speaker:Track 2: This is not relevant to you. We're really fucking off the rails here.
Speaker:Track 2: We just want to, I mean, this is always what happens at the end.
Speaker:Track 2: It's like talking about movies and the actor or actress who's in presumably one of them. But,
Speaker:Track 2: we can take a Rene Russo movies offline. I mean, I think my favorite movie that
Speaker:Track 2: she, not necessarily her performance, but I love both Tin Cup and Get Shorty.
Speaker:Track 2: I'm sorry. I just. I like Get Shorty.
Speaker:Track 2: Get Shorty is such a peak 90s and also Outbreak, which isn't by all means a
Speaker:Track 2: great movie, but also it's like a fun 90s. Yeah.
Speaker:Track 2: I was going to say actually Outbreak, I think. For me, Outbreak is like her, like one of her best.
Speaker:Track 2: Outbreak is good. I mean then she's in all the lethal weapon sequels or whatever
Speaker:Track 2: but yes she is um I got nothing to last clearly because we're here just talking about actors Rene Russo,
Speaker:Track 2: alright everybody we will smell you later I'm still not saying that,
Speaker:Track 2: have a good one.
