In this episode of Left of the Projector, I discuss the 1976 film Network with graduate film student Andre Swai. We analyze the film's biting satire on media, focusing on Howard Beale's descent into sensationalism and Faye Dunaway's obsession with ratings. Our conversation highlights the film's critique of corporate greed and its relevance in today's media landscape as we approach 2024. We also draw connections to other films that echo similar themes, reinforcing "Network's" enduring significance in cultural commentary on the interplay between entertainment and societal values.
Apologies for the quality on this one.
Andre Swai
https://www.instagram.com/andre.swai
https://letterboxd.com/dreswai/
Left of the Projector Links
https://www.patreon.com/LeftoftheProjectorPod
https://leftoftheprojector.com
https://instagram.com/leftoftheprojector
Opening: Hello and welcome to Left of the Projector. I am your host Evan,
Speaker:Opening: back again with another film discussion from the left.
Speaker:Opening: You can follow the show at leftoftheprojector.com.
Speaker:Opening: It would be greatly appreciated if you could like, follow, subscribe,
Speaker:Opening: and leave a rating. It's much appreciated.
Speaker:Opening: This week on the show, we dial it back to the year 1976 for the Satirical Comedy Network.
Speaker:Opening: It is directed by Sidney Lumet and it stars Faye Dunaway, William Holden,
Speaker:Opening: Peter Finch, and Robert Duvall.
Speaker:Opening: Back on the show, I have Andre Sway.
Speaker:Opening: Andre joined me months back for an episode on Men in Black.
Speaker:Opening: And I have him back again to discuss this pretty relevant and pertinent film in the year 2024.
Speaker:Opening: I hope you enjoy this week's episode on Network.
Speaker:Evan: All right. Well, thank you for joining me today, Andre.
Speaker:Andre: How are you doing, Evan?
Speaker:Evan: Good. Thanks for coming back. For anyone who's been listening for a while,
Speaker:Evan: Andre was on for a discussion on Men in Black.
Speaker:Evan: But we're back to discuss network and
Speaker:Evan: I'm gonna try hard not to refer to it as the network because it's weird that
Speaker:Evan: it's just network but I know I swear I like kept searching for him like why
Speaker:Evan: is it not coming up for the network but yeah I guess before we jump into the
Speaker:Evan: to the movie discussion I don't if you wanted to introduce introduce yourself
Speaker:Evan: tell anyone about any of your you know work that's going on anything like that so.
Speaker:Andre: I'm Andres way I'm a graduate student at I'm not gonna tell you where I'm a
Speaker:Andre: graduate student right now getting my my master's degree.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, I've studied film at the collegiate level, uh, for a little over four years now.
Speaker:Andre: And I really enjoy it a lot. Uh, I have a podcast called thank you for consuming
Speaker:Andre: that is out on Spotify and, uh, YouTube.
Speaker:Andre: And, uh, yeah, you can just find that at thank you for consuming on,
Speaker:Andre: uh, most social media platforms.
Speaker:Andre: But yeah, I love movies, watch a lot of them. Wanted to talk to my friend, Evan.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, no, I'm glad to have you back. I love, uh, we had a great discussion last time.
Speaker:Evan: And the network is, for anyone, everyone heard the intro. It's back from the 1970s, 1976.
Speaker:Evan: According to Wikipedia's generic description, it's a satirical black comedy drama.
Speaker:Evan: So they just decided to include every name.
Speaker:Evan: But before we jump into the film, I've been doing this just for fun.
Speaker:Evan: Just curious what people say is, if you could have dinner with any actor,
Speaker:Evan: or whether it's someone living, dead, maybe I'm putting you on the spot a little
Speaker:Evan: bit, but what would you go with?
Speaker:Andre: It has to be an actor.
Speaker:Evan: I'm just thinking actor because it's a movie. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker:Andre: I was thinking, obviously, one of the first people that comes to mind is Stanley Kubrick.
Speaker:Andre: He's not an actor. Obviously, he's a director.
Speaker:Andre: I wonder how fucked up that guy's head is.
Speaker:Andre: I wonder how annoying he is. Have you ever seen Dinner with Andre by any chance?
Speaker:Evan: Oh, yeah.
Speaker:Andre: I started watching it recently, and I just didn't enjoy it.
Speaker:Andre: It's just like a conversation with like a really pretentious person
Speaker:Andre: you know that's like what it is you know i i feel
Speaker:Andre: like that's what a conversation with stanley kubrick would be like and i'd
Speaker:Andre: like to have a conversation with him and like pick his brain because he
Speaker:Andre: seems so intense and so like deeply serious
Speaker:Andre: so having a conversation with him would be pretty good and
Speaker:Andre: then obviously i feel like you have to throw like denzel washington in there
Speaker:Andre: uh just like he seems like somebody who would just give good life advice and
Speaker:Andre: would just be fun to talk to be able to tell a whole bunch cool stories uh so
Speaker:Andre: yeah i think like stanley kubrick as a director and then denzel washington as
Speaker:Andre: an actor is someone who i would definitely like consider talking to.
Speaker:Evan: Stanley kubrick is a good one i i also can't imagine
Speaker:Evan: what it would be like to uh to talk to him i mean that i think director also
Speaker:Evan: counts i mean that's i guess someone within movies but for me i don't know i
Speaker:Evan: i always have to think of someone different i would probably say just because
Speaker:Evan: i watched a couple of his movies recently is William Friedkin.
Speaker:Evan: He directed Exorcist and a whole bunch of other movies.
Speaker:Evan: And I just watched a few of them recently. And he also seems kind of crazy.
Speaker:Evan: I mean, maybe that kind of goes with the territory of some of these directors
Speaker:Evan: is that he was known to just be a lunatic on the set, requiring all...
Speaker:Evan: Same thing with Stanley Kubrick.
Speaker:Evan: I feel like they're cut from the same cloth, the same demanding everything.
Speaker:Evan: But yeah, it would be interesting to hear all the stories behind Exorcist to
Speaker:Evan: see if they're actually all true, what he thinks about them.
Speaker:Evan: You know, anyone out there who hasn't watched, there's an exorcist documentary.
Speaker:Evan: It's worth finding on YouTube. It's a wild ride.
Speaker:Andre: I also think Steve Buscemi would be on there. I was just thinking about like
Speaker:Andre: actors who I love watching and I just watched the death of Stalin and Steve Buscemi.
Speaker:Andre: I'd love to hear what he has to say. He seems fun and he seems like he'd have a lot of stories.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, it's funny. It's funny you mentioned him. What I'm trying to think, I'm now blanking on it.
Speaker:Evan: He's been in a whole bunch of Coen Brothers movies, but he was in Miller's Crossing
Speaker:Evan: with his, I think, first acting role.
Speaker:Evan: And they essentially chose him because he could say lines really fast.
Speaker:Evan: And that's how he got his first role. He could just spit lines really quickly.
Speaker:Evan: And he does seem like a pretty cool dude.
Speaker:Andre: I find it so funny that you bring up, that you mentioned Miller's Crossing,
Speaker:Andre: because I had never heard of this film before.
Speaker:Andre: But one of my professors absolutely loves studying under him,
Speaker:Andre: Marco Abel. He wrote this book
Speaker:Andre: called Violent Affect Literature Cinema Critique After Representation.
Speaker:Andre: And it's essentially just about the use of violence in film.
Speaker:Andre: And it's something that seemed like it would be incredibly relevant to me.
Speaker:Andre: So I decided to start reading it. And the first chapter is literally over Miller's Crossing.
Speaker:Andre: And I'm like, I've never seen that film. I don't want to read this chapter if I haven't seen it yet.
Speaker:Andre: So yeah, I'm glad that you've seen that as well. Do you think it's worth watching?
Speaker:Evan: Oh, yeah. It's great. great it's so i hadn't seen
Speaker:Evan: it until maybe a year ago and someone requested to
Speaker:Evan: do it on the podcast i'm like well i guess i i should watch it i've watched
Speaker:Evan: it two or three times since then or in preparation and it's it's very good it's
Speaker:Evan: like a period piece that doesn't feel dated and the violence as since you're
Speaker:Evan: talking about the violence of it it's very i don't want to give too much away
Speaker:Evan: but there's one particular scene kind of in the middle i started watching.
Speaker:Andre: It and i.
Speaker:Evan: Like ended.
Speaker:Andre: It after like 20 minutes i don't do that very often but i'll have to go back to it i'll have to go I.
Speaker:Evan: Have to say the first time I saw it, the first 25, 30 minutes kind of felt slow,
Speaker:Evan: but it really does pick up.
Speaker:Evan: I have to say when you say that, it's like I could see the first bit of it kind
Speaker:Evan: of being like, oh, what am I getting into here?
Speaker:Andre: And I'm like, I got to pay attention. You know, that's the thing.
Speaker:Evan: Too. Like, that's why you get to see Buscemi. But yeah, as far as you know,
Speaker:Evan: you I guess we've talked briefly about different movies you've mentioned,
Speaker:Evan: you know, as ones you want to talk about.
Speaker:Evan: But you brought up the you brought up Network, not the Network.
Speaker:Evan: So I guess, what brought you to think about this one today?
Speaker:Evan: Not today, but in 2024?
Speaker:Andre: So I do this every time that I travel.
Speaker:Andre: So I've got my undergrad in Kentucky, and I'm getting my master's degree in
Speaker:Andre: Nebraska right now. I'm from Missouri.
Speaker:Andre: So there's always these times of the year to where I'm traveling back.
Speaker:Andre: So I'll be driving for five, six hours. And I decided to just start watching
Speaker:Andre: movies while I do it. Sue me, I know.
Speaker:Andre: I just like, I try to watch shit that I either will never watch or that I've
Speaker:Andre: already seen or something that I'll just listen to.
Speaker:Andre: Network typically wouldn't be up there, you know, but I just turned it on and
Speaker:Andre: it resonated with me so hard.
Speaker:Andre: Like few films have captivated me as much as network has.
Speaker:Andre: And I think that's because of its satirical elements, you know?
Speaker:Andre: It is very much like a black comedy satirical film in a way that I really enjoy.
Speaker:Andre: So what brought me to it was just how relevant it was. I've also been writing
Speaker:Andre: about satire for the last four or five months for my degree in master's school.
Speaker:Andre: And I just love the political poignancy of satire as a comedic vehicle.
Speaker:Andre: And I think that this film just does it a phenomenal service you know.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah I think not only is it just an incredible
Speaker:Evan: satire and all of those things you said
Speaker:Evan: but it's also kind of incredible how prophetic I think it was in so many ways
Speaker:Evan: I mean we'll get into a lot of the even just in the early stages of this uh
Speaker:Evan: of the uh the movie like I feel like it really kind of um I don't want to say
Speaker:Evan: predict but sort of describes you know these sensationalized news stories you see you know,
Speaker:Evan: from Fox News and other networks,
Speaker:Evan: of course, but it really is incredible, all the elements.
Speaker:Evan: And I guess just as a very brief, I'm not going to summarize the entire film
Speaker:Evan: for anyone who hasn't seen it. But it takes place in 1975.
Speaker:Evan: And there's a sort of star anchor, longtime anchor named Howard Beale, who's fired.
Speaker:Evan: And actually, it's funny enough, he was fired on September 22,
Speaker:Evan: which was my birthday. I just thought that was funny.
Speaker:Evan: But he, you know, he's fired from the news, And he goes back on and he says
Speaker:Evan: he's going to kill himself.
Speaker:Evan: And then they, you know, eventually let him go back on to apologize.
Speaker:Evan: And he starts kind of going out and doing kind of a, I guess you could call
Speaker:Evan: it a kind of populist, you know, everything is bullshit, you know, all about life.
Speaker:Evan: And slowly but surely, he's kind of his trajectory of his show kind of completely
Speaker:Evan: changes as, you know, Faye Dunaway's character in this kind of creates just,
Speaker:Evan: well, we'll discuss it, just insane,
Speaker:Evan: making it kind of a mockery of him and his news and everything. thing.
Speaker:Evan: And, you know, it's just, I don't know, I lost my train of thought.
Speaker:Evan: But what do you mean? What do you think about the, did you think that it does
Speaker:Evan: sort of predict where we are as far as news networks and kind of how they operate?
Speaker:Andre: I don't like the word predict in so far as I like illuminates maybe.
Speaker:Andre: I think that it definitely speaks to a phenomena that existed,
Speaker:Andre: not one that I think necessarily hegemonically exists now, you know?
Speaker:Andre: Uh, I agree with sentiments that this film was relevant in a lot of ways, but I feel like, uh,
Speaker:Andre: it was relevant in the time that it was created in the era to where television
Speaker:Andre: and revolution both had the hegemony that they currently do not have.
Speaker:Andre: Revolution has been put on the back burner functionally
Speaker:Andre: since the 1960s granted it has been accelerating a lot
Speaker:Andre: over the last decade uh and then similarly with
Speaker:Andre: television television doesn't have the same type of
Speaker:Andre: like power and stranglehold that it used to
Speaker:Andre: have and even when it did less than
Speaker:Andre: like two decades ago it wasn't nearly
Speaker:Andre: focused on the revolutionary aspects as much as
Speaker:Andre: i feel like it used to be uh so i feel
Speaker:Andre: like this film if we were to apply it to
Speaker:Andre: contemporary prairie times we could just sub out the explicit
Speaker:Andre: fear-mongering about like leftism for just terrorism
Speaker:Andre: uh because this is just like a
Speaker:Andre: film about how the television industry works in collaboration with the war on
Speaker:Andre: terror that's like what the film is on uh so i feel like it's incredibly relevant
Speaker:Andre: in that way uh because it's not trying to like television studios aren't trying
Speaker:Andre: to spoon feed people revolution anymore but rather spoon feed them fear if that
Speaker:Andre: makes sense. Do you know what I mean?
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, yeah, for sure. And I think, you know, even I would say even more recently
Speaker:Evan: in the last, I want to say five years, there have been more movies that have
Speaker:Evan: been trying to capitalize on the idea of revolution,
Speaker:Evan: anti-capitalist sentiment, but doing it in a way that's very commercial.
Speaker:Evan: Like I think of like The Menu and I think of Glass Onion and some of those,
Speaker:Evan: Those, yeah, Triangle of Sadness, those are all kind of talking about revolution
Speaker:Evan: and talking about these things, but they're not doing it in a way that's actually useful.
Speaker:Andre: Sure. I don't know. I guess I've just become disillusioned with what the role
Speaker:Andre: of anti-capitalist film is supposed to be in the first place.
Speaker:Andre: You know is it supposed to be a template
Speaker:Andre: on how to firebomb a walmart or is it supposed
Speaker:Andre: to be a form of critical consciousness raising that
Speaker:Andre: simply tells a narrative through an anti-capitalist lens uh triangle of sadness
Speaker:Andre: in particular like i don't think anybody thinks that these movies are revolutionary
Speaker:Andre: you know they may like draw from like revolutionary uh theology or like uh theories and everything.
Speaker:Andre: But I think anybody who tries to look towards these movies for any sort of template
Speaker:Andre: for revolution is going to be thoroughly disappointed.
Speaker:Andre: Same thing with the network. I don't think the network is necessarily trying
Speaker:Andre: to provide a template for revolution or anything, but it certainly shows people,
Speaker:Andre: what activism could look like. Definitely.
Speaker:Evan: I think one of the other and I'm kind of skipping around a little bit,
Speaker:Evan: but one of the notes I wrote down when I was watching it, so you have Again, you had Howard Beal.
Speaker:Evan: He's fired. He decides to...
Speaker:Evan: They put him back on the air to apologize, and he goes into this populist rant.
Speaker:Evan: And just as I'm watching it, I noted, it feels like his populist message that
Speaker:Evan: really, the network didn't air that he was on the air essentially talking about
Speaker:Evan: things that technically doesn't benefit their status quo type of thing.
Speaker:Evan: But at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter to them.
Speaker:Evan: And I guess what I'm thinking is,
Speaker:Evan: does it remind you or is it, do you think it's fair to compare in some way his
Speaker:Evan: populist message to some of these,
Speaker:Evan: you know, other more recent populist messages of, you know, kind of newscasters
Speaker:Evan: where they're trying to use the idea of populism, but they're really using it through a lens of,
Speaker:Evan: you know, you're on a multi-billion dollar conglomerate TV network.
Speaker:Evan: You don't really have the pulse of the people, if you will. I don't.
Speaker:Andre: So I guess, are you asking whether or not I feel like the populism in the show
Speaker:Andre: is relevant to the populism of modern day?
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, I guess that. And also, just do you think, I guess, maybe how do you view
Speaker:Evan: the kind of the populist message that Beale is trying to, or I guess that they're
Speaker:Evan: putting out through him in the network? work?
Speaker:Andre: Essentially, I wish that the left would do a populism, you know,
Speaker:Andre: like, I wish that we could have some sort of like, populist figure,
Speaker:Andre: the closest that we've gotten to that.
Speaker:Andre: In recent years, I like to think it's like Bernie Sanders, you know,
Speaker:Andre: as being like the closest to a populist figure.
Speaker:Andre: And when it comes to like, television and like news, granted,
Speaker:Andre: I don't watch CNN, MSNBC, Fox News a lot often.
Speaker:Andre: But whenever I do think of populism, I think like Newsmax and Fox News and like
Speaker:Andre: the bad kinds of popular.
Speaker:Andre: Uh so if anything i like this film for like depicting
Speaker:Andre: how populism is essentially just
Speaker:Andre: like a tool for the elites in
Speaker:Andre: a lot of ways you know like go along with it uh for like a little bit but at
Speaker:Andre: the end of the day they're not deploying populist messaging because they uh
Speaker:Andre: genuinely want like material change for the people but rather just because they
Speaker:Andre: know that it's like a great way to galvanize viewership you know yeah.
Speaker:Evan: I think of like someone like tucker carlson or some of those other Newsmax anchors
Speaker:Evan: where they're they're not they don't have the they don't care about the people
Speaker:Evan: they're doing it because it brings in viewers and it gives you the you know
Speaker:Evan: that yeah like you said the kind of like the masses kind of galvanizes them
Speaker:Evan: but it doesn't really get them to.
Speaker:Andre: Do anything except complain uh this film made me uh like I like it whenever
Speaker:Andre: I can watch a film and walk away uh learning something different like about
Speaker:Andre: myself as a person I realized that I'm still very much holding on to the false
Speaker:Andre: hopes that TV and television of like that movies and television have sold me,
Speaker:Andre: you know, and that's what I feel like the network does a really good job of
Speaker:Andre: like diagnosing the fact that like, people are so we've become so enveloped
Speaker:Andre: in media that we think that our life is media, you know, for like,
Speaker:Andre: for me, for example, right?
Speaker:Andre: My mother and father both struggled with addiction.
Speaker:Andre: I witnessed my father pass away. I had to conduct CPR on him.
Speaker:Andre: Before that, my method mother kicked me out. And then my father passed away.
Speaker:Andre: All of these things, I were like, oh my God, that's a great first act.
Speaker:Andre: I'm going to do great things.
Speaker:Andre: I have to go be a director, an actor, a president.
Speaker:Andre: Any of these bombastic-ass beliefs. Leafs.
Speaker:Andre: This film helped me realize that a lot of the stuff that we think is going to
Speaker:Andre: happen in our lives is because we've been trained and conditioned in a lot of
Speaker:Andre: ways by narratives and media tropes to think that that's what's going to happen.
Speaker:Andre: And the network just straight up has a line to where they're just like,
Speaker:Andre: you need to quit thinking that your life is the movies because it's not.
Speaker:Andre: They sold you the movies and they sold you a lie.
Speaker:Andre: And I'm just like, damn, okay, I guess I'm never doing Hollywood stuff.
Speaker:Andre: And that's fine. That's fine.
Speaker:Evan: It's crazy, though, that you think about them using those lines in,
Speaker:Evan: again, 1976 when this comes out.
Speaker:Evan: Obviously, Hollywood had been around for decades upon decades,
Speaker:Evan: and people understood how it works. And actually, I'm going to slightly change
Speaker:Evan: gears just because I'm thinking about the screenplay. And this is something I learned only today.
Speaker:Evan: So The Network was directed by Sidney Lumet, but the screenwriter was Paddy
Speaker:Evan: Chafsky. I think that's how you pronounce it.
Speaker:Evan: And he apparently... There's different stories about how he got the idea for the movie.
Speaker:Evan: Apparently, someone actually did commit suicide on air in Florida a couple years
Speaker:Evan: before this, and he supposedly got the idea as it went through.
Speaker:Evan: But I learned today that he is...
Speaker:Evan: A Zionist who wrote essentially propaganda for Israel in the 1970s,
Speaker:Evan: you know, to apparently also wrote some screenplay then that got shelved because
Speaker:Evan: of the Yom Kippur War, which I think was in 1973.
Speaker:Evan: So I don't know how that changes my perspective of the movie at all.
Speaker:Evan: I don't know that it changes kind of the plot or anything like that.
Speaker:Evan: But I did find it an interesting thing. I don't know if you,
Speaker:Evan: how you would take that as.
Speaker:Andre: Does it matter? I certainly feel like it matters.
Speaker:Andre: And so far as like, uh, any, like everything should go into your political analysis of the film.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, I agree with you that it doesn't really like, it doesn't carry a giant,
Speaker:Andre: like, uh, like a giant, it doesn't change the way that I view the message of the film.
Speaker:Andre: I guess if that's what you're asking, uh, anything,
Speaker:Andre: what it potentially does change is it's
Speaker:Andre: honestly really hard to understand what it changes because i am not
Speaker:Andre: super familiar with what the israel-palestine context
Speaker:Andre: was like in 1975 granted i still know that it was like abhorrent and like not
Speaker:Andre: something and something that like a lot of humanitarians disagreed with you
Speaker:Andre: know uh but i feel like it's hard to pinpoint exactly how it changes the screenplay
Speaker:Andre: without me remembering exactly what was going on at the time you know yeah.
Speaker:Evan: No i i completely agree i mean i I don't think it directly changed the idea and the screenplay.
Speaker:Evan: The only thing that I did find, and this is partly a Wikipedia that I looked
Speaker:Evan: at it elsewhere, apparently there were some other people that were up for roles
Speaker:Evan: for the film, including one of them being, was it Jane Fonda,
Speaker:Evan: was suggested instead of the Faye Dunaway.
Speaker:Evan: And she was told they don't want her to be in it because she had been speaking
Speaker:Evan: out in favor of Palestinian rights even back in the 1970s.
Speaker:Evan: And so she was basically told, we're not going to have you. And there are a
Speaker:Evan: couple other debated things here as to who others.
Speaker:Evan: So it seems more that it affected the people who played the production as opposed
Speaker:Evan: to the actual screenwriting.
Speaker:Evan: It seems like he was maybe able to.
Speaker:Evan: That didn't bleed into it because there's nothing even mentioned in this movie
Speaker:Evan: really related to international politics, other than when we find out later
Speaker:Evan: that the company who owns the network is being purchased by a Saudi Arabian
Speaker:Evan: company, which I also want to get.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah, thank you for bringing that back up. I forgot about that.
Speaker:Andre: Very 1975 villain, very 1975 villain to like,
Speaker:Andre: have Saudi Arabia or just like the Middle East conglomerates be the villain
Speaker:Andre: pause that absolutely put some of his Zionist backgrounds into.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah. And so far as like, his whole thing is like, oh my god,
Speaker:Andre: the Arab world is getting too much money in controlling the media. That's the argument.
Speaker:Andre: Like that's the argument is the arab world are
Speaker:Andre: aggressors who are controlling the media and i feel like
Speaker:Andre: that's like a really not necessarily a freudian so but we know that like yes
Speaker:Andre: like don't get it twisted uh there are arab corporations like oil conglomerates
Speaker:Andre: who have a hand in u.s media but so do israeli zionist corporations as well uh both.
Speaker:Evan: Of them have a stranglehold on like.
Speaker:Andre: What can be said about the region uh so i find that very interesting and i completely
Speaker:Andre: forgot about that aspect of the film.
Speaker:Evan: I know that's as soon as i as soon as i thought of it there now
Speaker:Evan: it kind of you then you said it it clicked into my head there
Speaker:Evan: because they also i mean the big thing in the 70s was like oil crisis there
Speaker:Evan: was opec you know raising prices and they've mentioned it a few times in the
Speaker:Evan: movie i think they say you know as part of when they're like discussing the
Speaker:Evan: like the production for different episodes like oh we're gonna spend you know
Speaker:Evan: 30 seconds talking about OPEC and this and that and other things.
Speaker:Evan: And so clearly it was on their mind as to the Middle Eastern,
Speaker:Evan: as you said, like they're having, they have a controlling interest in US media.
Speaker:Evan: But what I also found, this was another parallel that I thought of even before
Speaker:Evan: thinking of the director being a Zionist is it sort of reminds me,
Speaker:Evan: because they talk about how the reason they had to sell it was because they
Speaker:Evan: owed so much money to Saudi Arabia, like they're in debt to them.
Speaker:Evan: It kind of reminds me of like, I could, you could have this movie made today.
Speaker:Evan: Say it would be china right like we owe money to china yeah and it seemed like
Speaker:Evan: a very one-to-one kind of ideas like there's someone out there that we owe money
Speaker:Evan: to we have debt to we have to sell our souls you know or our media to let them
Speaker:Evan: because we have no choice uh.
Speaker:Andre: Have you seen bamboozled.
Speaker:Evan: I don't think i have actually bamboozled.
Speaker:Andre: Is a spike lee film it's another satire that tackles the television industry
Speaker:Andre: and they both essentially uh forward the same thesis but from like different perspectives,
Speaker:Andre: both of them are, which like the television industry sells revolution,
Speaker:Andre: not as a method to genuinely further revolutionary sentiment,
Speaker:Andre: but rather this is a way to like increase their profit margins and viewership.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, and I think that like bamboozled juxtaposes itself really nicely with this film.
Speaker:Andre: So this is like the white elitist cousin of bamboozled.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, like both of them literally have like,
Speaker:Andre: white network executives being like like
Speaker:Andre: white privileged network executives from ivy backgrounds being like this is
Speaker:Andre: what the revolution show should be you know both of them make fun of television
Speaker:Andre: studios for like propping up revolution in ways in which they have no right
Speaker:Andre: to be propping up because they're so divorced from what it actually yeah.
Speaker:Evan: That reminds me directly i don't know if this is what you're thinking of i have
Speaker:Evan: to watch bamboozle i i've heard of it i just it's one of the Spike Lee movies I haven't seen.
Speaker:Evan: But there's the scene later on, and part of the subplot of Network in the film
Speaker:Evan: is that there's sort of this woman who I'm blanking on her name.
Speaker:Evan: Is it Laureen Hobbs? I think she's like a communist. She's part of the Communist Party.
Speaker:Evan: And they basically bring her in because she has some connection to this,
Speaker:Evan: you know, Maoist organization.
Speaker:Evan: And they want to essentially create a show on TV called The Maoist,
Speaker:Evan: what is it? The Maoist Hour or something like that. The Mouse a Tongue Hour.
Speaker:Evan: And they want to basically use footage of this terrorist group or this leftist
Speaker:Evan: group, whatever word you want to use to describe them, from robbing banks and all these things.
Speaker:Evan: And later on, when they finally bring the leader of this group in,
Speaker:Evan: there's a scene where they're all sitting around in his hideout with the media
Speaker:Evan: executives talking about the contract.
Speaker:Evan: And i just like the satire on that like it's almost it's so thick in that i
Speaker:Evan: mean do you think that they're they're playing also on the idea that eventually
Speaker:Evan: these leftist organizations will are basically like we're eventually going to
Speaker:Evan: just sell our soul because we'll we'll get on tv i don't know it's definitely critiquing.
Speaker:Andre: The idea of co-option for sure and the idea of working within uh like working
Speaker:Andre: within a prescribed system or method you know uh the nao seitang group was who's
Speaker:Andre: literally like a terroristic revolutionary group,
Speaker:Andre: slowly through their relationship with the
Speaker:Andre: media becomes docile and realizes that
Speaker:Andre: like oh but we need to prioritize our profits
Speaker:Andre: you know so they themselves get subjected to the very uh like values that they're
Speaker:Andre: fighting against and i definitely think that's intentional uh it's the same
Speaker:Andre: argument that like uh bamboozled makes in a lot of ways like you start doing
Speaker:Andre: it because you You think it's revolutionary.
Speaker:Andre: And then in the end, you're doing something incredibly anti-revolutionary.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, that's interesting. It sounds like they're very similar type of movie.
Speaker:Evan: But yeah, the word co-opting does make sense.
Speaker:Evan: And also that they just, you know, I mean, I don't think it was necessarily
Speaker:Evan: the intention of the network of, you know, Faye Dunaway's character who wants
Speaker:Evan: to build up the network, make them profitable, have popular TV shows.
Speaker:Evan: Was it intention to neuter in some ways this leftist organization?
Speaker:Evan: But it just kind of, if you maybe look at it from the top level perspective
Speaker:Evan: of the network, you know, what is it? C, what's the all letters? UBS? No.
Speaker:Andre: I'm not sure.
Speaker:Evan: Whatever it is. CCA. You know, CNN.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, CA. Yeah. So, you know, it's, you know, especially when I think of the
Speaker:Evan: kind of the scene that I knew of before I ever had seen this movie.
Speaker:Evan: There's a powerful moment where Howard Beale gets called to the,
Speaker:Evan: you know, the, basically the CEO's office headquarters to be reamed out because
Speaker:Evan: he's giving away kind of the game.
Speaker:Evan: You know, he's essentially telling the audience that the, he's given away the, you know, he's,
Speaker:Evan: giving everyone a peek behind the counter.
Speaker:Andre: You have messed with... I don't remember what he says, but he starts tweaking.
Speaker:Andre: He starts bugging. He's just putting his hands up like this and starts going crazy.
Speaker:Evan: I love also how all the little green lamps that apparently each person individually
Speaker:Evan: has to have, like the long... He has to have it in that long conference room.
Speaker:Evan: It's just like a very cool scene.
Speaker:Evan: And then eventually after he bugs out, he kind of just lowers his voice and
Speaker:Evan: everything comes back down.
Speaker:Evan: He's like, dude, you told everyone what's going on and this is just the way of the world.
Speaker:Evan: Capitalism is good and you know it's good that corporations own everything and
Speaker:Evan: i think the funniest part about that is that they he says you know capitalists
Speaker:Evan: you know or corporations,
Speaker:Evan: actually want to improve the lives of people and it's just kind of like i couldn't
Speaker:Evan: like i literally laughed out loud when he said that it's not maybe funny but
Speaker:Evan: it's like bro it's you're you're telling people that the capitalists want to
Speaker:Evan: improve the lives of people and that's certainly not I think that scene is probably.
Speaker:Andre: It's certainly the best in the film or the most iconic film.
Speaker:Andre: I had seen a comedian or a TikTok that was referencing it within the last year or so, you know?
Speaker:Andre: And then I just watched the film randomly. I just chose it on.
Speaker:Andre: I just put it on because it said satire and television. And I was like, oh, that's what I study.
Speaker:Andre: And then that scene came up and I was like, oh, I've seen this before.
Speaker:Andre: That scene is so, it perfectly encapsulates how this film is anti-capital.
Speaker:Andre: And how it's just like point blank period anti-capitalist films and they don't
Speaker:Andre: make movies like that anymore they don't make i don't want to say they don't
Speaker:Andre: make movies like that anymore because they do as demonstrated by what we talked
Speaker:Andre: about with the menu of sadness etc,
Speaker:Andre: they're not though insofar as like the villain in that that scene is so like
Speaker:Andre: the mise-en-scene of it the lighting everything is pointing to the fact that
Speaker:Andre: this guy is bad like the capitalist at the end of the table is working in the
Speaker:Andre: shadows and he looks literally like a demon or the devil like he It does not look,
Speaker:Andre: it doesn't look natural. It very much looks supernatural.
Speaker:Andre: And the ethos that it gives off isn't like a good loving ethos.
Speaker:Andre: It's like demonic and sketchy.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, it is pretty, pretty incredible how, yeah, again, I think I said like,
Speaker:Evan: I had seen that scene before, the clip of that before I'd ever seen this for
Speaker:Evan: whatever reason. I don't know how it came across.
Speaker:Evan: But yeah, and then when I saw it, I'm like, oh, yeah, that's the scene.
Speaker:Evan: And when they do this on the on stage, they have they don't do it quite as well.
Speaker:Evan: You know, it's kind of as you said, it's pretty iconic the way that it's it's filmed.
Speaker:Evan: But yeah, I don't any movie that I can think of that we were talking about that's
Speaker:Evan: anti-capitalist in nature.
Speaker:Evan: I don't think that those kinds of moments like I think of Glass Onion,
Speaker:Evan: there's a part where near the end, you know, spoiler for anyone who hasn't seen it.
Speaker:Evan: I think that they start smashing all of Edward Norton's stuff and symbolizing
Speaker:Evan: some kind of showing... I'm trying to remember exactly.
Speaker:Evan: I covered this movement in this podcast. I'm trying to remember.
Speaker:Evan: But it seems like the way they describe it is not the same way.
Speaker:Evan: Like oh well i guess there's nothing we can really do about it except like.
Speaker:Andre: Smash your.
Speaker:Evan: Stuff like we don't really have any recourse here but they're very much clearly
Speaker:Evan: just telling you these people are controlling everything and there's nothing.
Speaker:Andre: You can do about it yeah it's also it's kind of depressing yeah it is it's also
Speaker:Andre: just like it can be liberating as well you know uh at least for me like i just
Speaker:Andre: have to recognize that like anything that i any dream it sounds
Speaker:Andre: very pessimistic but it's not it is very like liberating
Speaker:Andre: uh what this film made me feel yeah it
Speaker:Andre: made me recognize that like a lot of the dreams and hopes that i had were instilled
Speaker:Andre: in me through film and television and they're therefore like unlikely to come
Speaker:Andre: into fruition but in helping me get over my childhood dreams it's like a weight
Speaker:Andre: has been lifted off my shoulders uh and also like,
Speaker:Andre: Films like this make you not have hope in capitalism, not have hope in television,
Speaker:Andre: not have hope in corporations, and allow you to envision something different,
Speaker:Andre: or at least be critical of those things, potentially.
Speaker:Evan: You know, this I think network makes it easier to, as you've said,
Speaker:Evan: as you just said in several times,
Speaker:Evan: I think it's easier to get to that conclusion through this that this the satire
Speaker:Evan: in this movie than any of those ones that came out.
Speaker:Evan: I mean, not maybe not ones from the 70s, but I think of, you know, modern ones.
Speaker:Evan: It doesn't it definitely doesn't hit. It hits harder, I think,
Speaker:Evan: than than any of these newer ones.
Speaker:Evan: I don't know if it's just simply, you know, I guess one thing we haven't even
Speaker:Evan: discussed that's unrelated to the plot itself, but just the cast of this movie
Speaker:Evan: is also quite good. I mentioned Faye Dunaway.
Speaker:Evan: William Holden is also in it. Peter Finch, Robert Duvall.
Speaker:Evan: And then you have a bunch of other, you know, smaller parts.
Speaker:Evan: And I think it was, I think they won three Academy Awards. I don't remember.
Speaker:Evan: Did one of them win Best Actor?
Speaker:Andre: I think three.
Speaker:Evan: Oh, Faye Dunaway won Best Supporting Actress. Yeah. So, I mean,
Speaker:Evan: it was just a, from a acting perspective, I thought it was just a,
Speaker:Evan: adds to the cherry on the top of just an excellent, um, Yeah, absolutely.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, a lot of the actors I'm not familiar with, like films from the seventies, uh, I don't know.
Speaker:Andre: I've seen like the biggest ones from the seventies, you know,
Speaker:Andre: but a lot of films from the seventies, like a lot of these actors I haven't
Speaker:Andre: been familiar with, but they were just absolutely amazing, you know, to watch.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah. I mean, some of them too, this was like sort of, I want to say the end
Speaker:Evan: of their careers, but especially like William Holden, who plays the kind of
Speaker:Evan: the boss or the, I guess the, the head of the news network at the time,
Speaker:Evan: he was in a lot of movies well before this.
Speaker:Evan: So he was like a pretty big star, like the forties, fifties, sixties.
Speaker:Evan: Like this is like his, I don't know, like the twilight of his career.
Speaker:Evan: So in some ways that's, uh, you know, I would, if you ever, if you see one movie
Speaker:Evan: with him in it, with William Holden, I would recommend seeing sunset Boulevard.
Speaker:Evan: It's a fifties, uh, noir. That's got it on my watch list.
Speaker:Andre: A hacked screenwriter writes a screenplay for a former silent film star who
Speaker:Andre: faded into Hollywood obscurity. I've heard. Yeah.
Speaker:Evan: Billy Wilder, I think, directed it, I'm pretty sure. It's an excellent one.
Speaker:Evan: I went through a little noir phase, I don't know, last year,
Speaker:Evan: watching a bunch of those 50s ones.
Speaker:Evan: And that's top tier for anyone listening that hasn't seen that.
Speaker:Evan: And then the other thing, too, I think the only actor in this that's really
Speaker:Evan: sort of earlier in the career, I guess you could say, is Robert Duvall. He's not too old.
Speaker:Evan: He was born in 1930, so he's only 30.
Speaker:Evan: 45 in this not that young but he's he's probably like the star of of this as far as movies.
Speaker:Andre: People have seen beyond this one godfather he's been in so many amazing films
Speaker:Andre: like all the godfather films thank you for smoking thx uh 1138 the road just
Speaker:Andre: absolutely amazing career uh i.
Speaker:Evan: Think he was in um bling blade i.
Speaker:Andre: Don't think he was in billy bob thornton yeah he wasn't no i know sling blade
Speaker:Andre: I'm from Marshfield, Missouri.
Speaker:Andre: So my mom, yeah, my mom just fucking loves mocking Billy Bob Thornton,
Speaker:Andre: you know, just like putting up,
Speaker:Andre: which I guess when I can think about it now is just ableism,
Speaker:Andre: but it's a Billy Bob Thornton impression specifically,
Speaker:Andre: you know, just goes.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, that's true. I haven't seen that movie in a long time,
Speaker:Evan: but I just remembered that he was in that too.
Speaker:Evan: What was the other... I had another question that I was thinking of that I lost track of.
Speaker:Evan: Oh, I know what it was. I mean, this is kind of going back to what we were talking
Speaker:Evan: about earlier with, you know, sort of the Faye Dunaway's character kind of creating
Speaker:Evan: these, you know, I guess you could almost call them reality television type things.
Speaker:Evan: For some reason when I was watching it I thought like is this using these this
Speaker:Evan: Maoist group to have the Mao Zedong hour is it kind of like the show cops in
Speaker:Evan: the sense of we're showing,
Speaker:Evan: it's not quite the same because it's arresting people and showing the power.
Speaker:Andre: From like a psychoanalysis perspective and so far as like what do these representations
Speaker:Andre: do for the psyche you know they probably have similar like they probably have
Speaker:Andre: like similar workings, you know,
Speaker:Andre: they're not, one of them is literally meant to defend the state.
Speaker:Andre: One of them is meant to, uh, critique the state.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, granted the,
Speaker:Andre: the one in network is like uh not actually trying to critique the state but
Speaker:Andre: at least it postures as if it is you know uh i'm trying to think of the comparisons to cops but.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah maybe it's not quite as strong as i was as i had noted as i was watching
Speaker:Evan: but i'm just thinking of a kind of they're using violence in a way to entertain
Speaker:Evan: you even though the violence as you said one's state violence versus you know,
Speaker:Evan: actually they're kind of opposites in a way because one is violence towards
Speaker:Evan: the state as like a revolutionary act even if it's what you know they referring
Speaker:Evan: to as terrorism whereas cops is simply showing the power of the state to react to yeah you know I.
Speaker:Andre: Think this film would make a good double feature with what's it called first
Speaker:Andre: reformed I think this and first would make a good.
Speaker:Evan: Double feature.
Speaker:Andre: And so far Whereas they're both movies centered around like leftist politics
Speaker:Andre: and doomism and like the idea of just ending it all in order to like get something better.
Speaker:Evan: It's funny, as you were before you said that as a double feature,
Speaker:Evan: I was actually thinking, I'm trying to think of the name of the movie,
Speaker:Evan: Nightcrawler with Jake Gyllenhaal. i was almost thinking that would even be also an.
Speaker:Andre: Interesting i.
Speaker:Evan: Don't know if it's quite double feature but it has that also the sensationalism
Speaker:Evan: of news and just the creation of these of using like crime in black neighborhoods
Speaker:Evan: and as the you know means to entertain people like that i did that one like a long time.
Speaker:Andre: Isn't it uh so the revolutionary groups that
Speaker:Andre: they in this film because i watched like two weeks ago i didn't end up re-watching
Speaker:Andre: it that's my bad uh the one that they're talking about don't they like aren't
Speaker:Andre: they attacking like privileged positions like privileged groups don't they kidnap
Speaker:Andre: like a don't they kidnap like a white baby yes.
Speaker:Evan: They do yeah i think the name of the terrorist group is the yukka um you medical liberation army.
Speaker:Andre: So yeah the comparison to nightcrawler definitely
Speaker:Andre: works insofar as like both of the films recognize that nobody
Speaker:Andre: gives a fuck about like crime in black neighborhoods that's not
Speaker:Andre: a story like crime in black neighborhoods isn't
Speaker:Andre: a story that's either a line in uh nightcrawler
Speaker:Andre: or this but what is a like newsworthy is whenever that crime goes into the like
Speaker:Andre: the safe places that we previously had whether it be like the suburb or things
Speaker:Andre: along those lines so both of the films have similar messages in that line wow
Speaker:Andre: yeah that's interesting.
Speaker:Evan: That's interesting yeah the um do.
Speaker:Andre: You know peter Peter Skarsgård or Peter. Yeah. I believe it's Peter Skarsgård.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah. He's married to Maggie Gyllenhaal.
Speaker:Andre: And so like, yeah.
Speaker:Evan: Right.
Speaker:Andre: And they're in presumed innocent together. Uh.
Speaker:Evan: Oh yeah yeah like isn't his dad um the other big actor too right he's in like
Speaker:Evan: dune no actually skarsgård no they're not related he's.
Speaker:Andre: Sars guard not scars guard.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah yeah sars guard it sounds like almost i feel like uh that was offensive for for.
Speaker:Andre: Some like a swedish people being like no that's actually wrong it.
Speaker:Evan: Could be a common name i don't know Okay. They're not related, but yeah.
Speaker:Evan: I was looking at some of the quotes that I wrote down, and there's not tons
Speaker:Evan: of context, but there's a bunch of times in this...
Speaker:Evan: Another subplot, I mean, I guess I would even really call it a subplot,
Speaker:Evan: is they're trying to... Part of the reason that they're making changes to the
Speaker:Evan: network is they're not profitable.
Speaker:Evan: And by putting this guy, Howard Beale, into this ridiculous show where he's
Speaker:Evan: basically like a televangelist on TV, where they have a person doing the,
Speaker:Evan: you know, the fortune telling it's, it's kind of, um,
Speaker:Evan: they're, they're, they're calling this still like a news show and it's almost kind of embarrassing.
Speaker:Evan: And just the satire of saying that this is a news show is almost,
Speaker:Evan: it's just, it's incredible.
Speaker:Evan: I mean, he like faints at the end of every broadcast. It's just, yeah.
Speaker:Andre: The fainting at the end of every rebroadcast was like so,
Speaker:Andre: there's a certain type of like I hate using this analogy because I've only seen
Speaker:Andre: like one of the films but like German Expressionism insofar as it's like it's
Speaker:Andre: so like bombastic and out there that like you just have to enjoy it you know yeah.
Speaker:Evan: The first I remember the first time he did I'm like oh is that part of the act
Speaker:Evan: is he doing this as part of you know he literally is fainting because it clearly
Speaker:Evan: is very clear that his character is not mentally stable and they're abusing him,
Speaker:Evan: Because it's making them money, which is, you know, another thing you could
Speaker:Evan: say, you know, he's one of the things I actually had a question is this,
Speaker:Evan: like, do you should you feel bad for Howard Beale's character?
Speaker:Evan: Do you feel bad that he's being, I guess you could say, exploited at some point?
Speaker:Evan: He's fired. Did they bring him back?
Speaker:Evan: He's depressed because he thinks God is talking to him. What would you say about that?
Speaker:Andre: Granted, I will need to rewatch it in order to have a very nuanced opinion.
Speaker:Andre: But my un-nuanced opinion is it's not like prior to the film,
Speaker:Andre: he was doing the American people justice.
Speaker:Andre: Right? like prior to the film like it's only at the beginning of
Speaker:Andre: the film once he's truly starts telling the american people how
Speaker:Andre: it is and what he has been complicit in uh
Speaker:Andre: he's also uh unfaithful to his wife was like an aspect of the film which like
Speaker:Andre: was like half of the film in a lot of ways that's like one of the key plot points
Speaker:Andre: of the film uh so it's kind of hard to feel bad for him as much as it is to
Speaker:Andre: be entertained by his downfall you know and you're just wondering like for me i I was wondering,
Speaker:Andre: like, is he being dead ass right now? Like, is he actually breaking down?
Speaker:Andre: Or is this like, I don't know.
Speaker:Andre: No, I never really thought it was an act as much as I was wondering,
Speaker:Andre: like, is he genuinely suffering from something right now?
Speaker:Andre: Or is he in a not a bad, is he not in a good place? And then just using this.
Speaker:Andre: That's not eloquent at all.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, no, I see what you're saying. But yeah, that is a question I thought too,
Speaker:Evan: is whether or not he initially is very depressed and angry he's losing his job.
Speaker:Evan: He says he's going to commit suicide.
Speaker:Evan: And then he then goes to the point of, okay, I'm going to go on TV and just
Speaker:Evan: like, you know, just go on and have your apology and just tell it like it is.
Speaker:Evan: And maybe it's just he sees that that is fun.
Speaker:Evan: It's kind of, it's a different, it's like a different way that he's behaving.
Speaker:Evan: And he maybe realizes that, okay, well, if I kind of do that,
Speaker:Evan: it maybe make me feel better about all the terrible things I actually did on the news by,
Speaker:Evan: you know, keeping things from the the american people so i don't know maybe
Speaker:Evan: it's almost like his he feels like it's some kind of retribution or not retribution
Speaker:Evan: is the wrong word um you know his apology tour yeah.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah exactly like him dying on the cross for our sins type shit which.
Speaker:Evan: Actually makes perfect sense given he's literally like a televangelist evangelist
Speaker:Evan: type of person up there fainting i mean i think that would be probably the most
Speaker:Evan: yeah the jesus analogies are definitely.
Speaker:Andre: There there's like room to make a Jesus analogy and argue that Howard Beale is Jesus.
Speaker:Andre: Uh, I think that that's like certainly not what was at the forefront of everyone's head.
Speaker:Andre: But the yeah yeah he's literally
Speaker:Andre: referred to as a prophet you know uh so there's
Speaker:Andre: certainly like stuff to be picked up
Speaker:Andre: on i think that uh yeah cindy lumet
Speaker:Andre: uh because he directed 12 angry men which
Speaker:Andre: is like just like also one of my favorite films yep uh he's
Speaker:Andre: always been like a relatively left-leaning director you know
Speaker:Andre: uh dog day afternoon like the humanization of like trans people which is so
Speaker:Andre: few and far between so that as well as this film uh i really have to like do
Speaker:Andre: a deep dive on this filmography and like watch all of them i know serpico is
Speaker:Andre: good i've heard lots of good things about that serpico.
Speaker:Evan: Is really good yeah.
Speaker:Andre: I think.
Speaker:Evan: The other one that i haven't seen all of a lot of his film but one that i watched
Speaker:Evan: i think years ago and i was not ready like a lot of movies i watched like with
Speaker:Evan: my parents who was like oh you have to watch this old movie and then and I wasn't
Speaker:Evan: in the right age or mind to watch it, was Murder on the Orient Express,
Speaker:Evan: which apparently is a really good one from, I think it came out in the 70s as
Speaker:Evan: well. It's an Agatha Christie book.
Speaker:Andre: Oh yeah, I know that it has to be good. Because it got recreated for a modern...
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, yeah. Actually, the thing that I was mentioning that we haven't talked about is,
Speaker:Evan: I guess the final couple minutes of the movie,
Speaker:Evan: be of the of the at the end is they're all
Speaker:Evan: of the executives are like they don't know what to do about
Speaker:Evan: howard beale they don't know what they're going to do because he's given away
Speaker:Evan: the game he's now all of a sudden his stock his you know his star is falling
Speaker:Evan: he's now um not popular anymore and they essentially decide to assassinate him
Speaker:Evan: on air by using the mouth the tongue you know terrorist's,
Speaker:Evan: sell the ela or whatever it's called ecumenical liberation
Speaker:Evan: army to do it while they film it live on air
Speaker:Evan: and i think they say at the end like this was a story of howard beale the first
Speaker:Evan: known instance of a man who was killed because of lousy ratings it's just just
Speaker:Evan: the most ridiculous way to end the movie and it's almost i don't know how else
Speaker:Evan: it almost felt like you didn't they didn't know what to do and it was just it's
Speaker:Evan: funny to have him be murdered on air i think it's that also plays back Back to the Jesus thing.
Speaker:Andre: Right?
Speaker:Evan: He sacrificed.
Speaker:Andre: He literally died for our sin. Howard, I don't know, that ending,
Speaker:Andre: I personally loved the ending solely because I love endings that feel abrupt.
Speaker:Andre: I don't know, there's something about the abruptness of it and the ending it,
Speaker:Andre: concluding it on the motif of television screens while I'm watching it on a phone screen.
Speaker:Andre: And that's why I feel like the film, while it's certainly relevant and it feels contemporary,
Speaker:Andre: contemporary it's just like not insofar as
Speaker:Andre: like the mechanisms that tv uses are not the
Speaker:Andre: mechanisms that like that like we use for our phone so
Speaker:Andre: the addiction is different and i would just love to see like a
Speaker:Andre: contemporary adaptation of this that accounts for
Speaker:Andre: the death of tell because television is no longer king they
Speaker:Andre: are no longer like brainwashing the entire like american population they're
Speaker:Andre: getting like older americans ages like 25 to 50 you know or like 25 and up people
Speaker:Andre: who watch tv uh so i'd love to see a contemporary adaptation of this film seems
Speaker:Andre: like it would be so great if.
Speaker:Evan: You did it now you'd have to use you know tiktok or.
Speaker:Andre: Some other system how you i think.
Speaker:Evan: It would relate to you know something related to streaming you know because
Speaker:Evan: that's That's kind of what's.
Speaker:Andre: Destroying things.
Speaker:Evan: Being scripted TV. I don't know.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah.
Speaker:Evan: I don't know. Someone out there could probably pitch this, and I bet it would.
Speaker:Evan: No, I mean, it would be a really good one to update, I think,
Speaker:Evan: because as I was saying, it feels relevant, but then you also have the dated
Speaker:Evan: aspects if it was actually updated.
Speaker:Evan: And also the thing, I also agree. I love endings that are just kind of shocking.
Speaker:Evan: I won't ruin it, but I just watched The Mist last night. I don't know if you've seen that before.
Speaker:Andre: See, that's what I mean by abrupt endings. haven't seen that film
Speaker:Andre: in a long time but that ending is stuck with me you
Speaker:Andre: know uh have you seen black oh yeah you know
Speaker:Andre: the oh yeah i have spoiler for i believe like the first
Speaker:Andre: episode of black mirror like one of the ones to
Speaker:Andre: where like he's on the webcam have you seen that one oh yeah i've never seen
Speaker:Andre: that before my friend described it to me beginning to end and it's one of my
Speaker:Andre: favorite black mirror episodes of all time and i've never seen it like it's
Speaker:Andre: one of my favorite stories of all time it's like a story that i'm still able
Speaker:Andre: to tell because the ending is so abrupt and so shocking,
Speaker:Andre: uh that it's kind of like twist granted it's.
Speaker:Evan: Not it's.
Speaker:Andre: Not like a twist in the network by any means uh but it's still like very enjoyable and like wow you know.
Speaker:Evan: I think it's also what makes it so good it's kind
Speaker:Evan: of the cavalier way that the executives are just like well i guess
Speaker:Evan: we just have to kill them and like the first like oh yeah i guess
Speaker:Evan: so and then they're just they just they don't talk about it like it's something
Speaker:Evan: evil really they're just like oh i guess so like who
Speaker:Evan: are we gonna have do it and then they of course have the you know the
Speaker:Evan: mouth of tongue hour or whatever they know that this
Speaker:Evan: group likes to again go
Speaker:Evan: after you know white rich wealthy people what
Speaker:Evan: better than to kill the you know howard beal the big
Speaker:Evan: you know elderly white man who's on tv preaching
Speaker:Evan: about god knows what yeah it's just it's uh it's
Speaker:Evan: quite perfect it's always um yeah like i mean we there's there's a lot for anyone
Speaker:Evan: who hasn't seen it it's well well worth the watch because lots of things we
Speaker:Evan: didn't really even get to like the whole thing you mentioned like A huge chunk
Speaker:Evan: of the movie is about infidelity and having an affair with Faye Dunaway and
Speaker:Evan: how she is sexually addicted to her job,
Speaker:Evan: which I think is a whole other piece to it that I think is really interesting.
Speaker:Evan: We didn't even talk about is how she can't even function on a day-to-day basis
Speaker:Evan: except to do her job, which is to make these ridiculous TV shows for profit.
Speaker:Evan: And I think it's kind of the way that these networks have almost trained and
Speaker:Evan: corrupted people to feel that way about their jobs when, you know, fuck these companies.
Speaker:Andre: I really enjoyed the film. It's like it's a condemnation on the culture industry
Speaker:Andre: that Hollywood creates.
Speaker:Andre: They love to like prop up revolution whenever it's convenient for them.
Speaker:Andre: But as soon as it starts galvanizing any kind of base or leading to anything
Speaker:Andre: other than like shareholder profit, they're obviously going to have pushback
Speaker:Andre: towards it. So yeah, I really enjoyed the film.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah, and that's such a big piece of it, too.
Speaker:Evan: Like, there's none of the aspects of, you know, the way that literally capitalism
Speaker:Evan: works is, you know, left out of this, which I think makes it such a good, a good satire.
Speaker:Evan: But Andre, anything that we didn't
Speaker:Evan: mention or anything you had left on the film that we we didn't cover?
Speaker:Andre: No not that I can think of directly off the
Speaker:Andre: top of my head I just remember watching it
Speaker:Andre: and immediately like at least like a few days
Speaker:Andre: after being like oh I should probably talk to Evan about this Evan
Speaker:Andre: would probably like this film and then I saw that you rated it as well so I'd
Speaker:Andre: love to like talk about it but yeah I really enjoyed it it's like one of the
Speaker:Andre: films that definitely needs to be remade but if they did there would certainly
Speaker:Andre: be pitfalls that would like feed into like right wing talking points and so far as like,
Speaker:Andre: uh like sjw media that does nothing but like do propaganda uh obviously they
Speaker:Andre: would replace saudi arabia would try and do some nice little like china fear-mongering
Speaker:Andre: uh so yeah i think it'd be interesting for it to be remade but in a vacuum as
Speaker:Andre: the text exists it's still amazing.
Speaker:Evan: I mean you could honestly unfortunately make this movie remade as kind of a
Speaker:Evan: right-wing movie as opposed to kind of anti-capitalist which i don't think would
Speaker:Evan: get made necessarily but i think there's a pretty good lens of looking at it
Speaker:Evan: that way you know you don't get many well not that you don't get right wing you know themed movies.
Speaker:Andre: I think if you were to take i think that it would be
Speaker:Andre: just i think it would be good because the revolutionary
Speaker:Andre: groups in this film i guess because their left-leaning
Speaker:Andre: group were automatically me and you are automatically sympathetic
Speaker:Andre: towards them and sympathetic towards their goal you know
Speaker:Andre: so it could definitely make sense by just swapping out
Speaker:Andre: the left-wing group the right-wing group because in many ways
Speaker:Andre: the movie is about how the television vision or about how news
Speaker:Andre: media manufactures this villain and i well i don't think that like right wing
Speaker:Andre: fascists are being manufactured by any point there is certainly a desire to
Speaker:Andre: have them out at the forefront of visibility in news so i think you could definitely
Speaker:Andre: like swap them and that could be interesting.
Speaker:Evan: Yeah. Immediately when you said that, I'm thinking of like Joker and also kind
Speaker:Evan: of what they took their movie from, The King of Comedy.
Speaker:Evan: Like those, that would also be another good double feature with this.
Speaker:Andre: I still need to watch that. I'll watch that after this.
Speaker:Evan: Oh, that's, it's a good one. I didn't see it until recently.
Speaker:Evan: And it's, I almost can't believe that's a Scorsese film.
Speaker:Evan: Like it doesn't, if you didn't tell me that when I watched it,
Speaker:Evan: I might not have known because it's such a different kind of movie that he's used to making.
Speaker:Evan: But then after you know you kind of see his hallmarks but yeah i
Speaker:Evan: mean this this one has been on my like movie list for a long time and no one
Speaker:Evan: had ever picked it so i'm glad that you uh that i just happened to watch it
Speaker:Evan: and you happened to watch it and uh make for the perfect uh perfect thing but
Speaker:Evan: yeah so i mean you want to just remind everyone your uh your podcast and i'll
Speaker:Evan: of course i can link it in the notes for anyone to uh yeah so it's.
Speaker:Andre: Uh thank you for consuming uh it's a play on thank you for smoking uh just one
Speaker:Andre: of my favorite films of all time and uh yeah we're getting it started up right
Speaker:Andre: now it's going to be a uh film podcast similarly uh that discusses uh leftist
Speaker:Andre: themes from a black perspective so.
Speaker:Evan: That sounds sweet no i mean i think more leftist discussions of media is is
Speaker:Evan: needed so any any of that kind of content uh is good but andre it's always a
Speaker:Evan: pleasure to have you on and you know you come across another uh you know this
Speaker:Evan: kind of happy accident of something.
Speaker:Evan: We'll certainly have to do it again, but everyone listening can check out Andre's podcast.
Speaker:Evan: Maybe when this podcast is released, yours will be out.
Speaker:Andre: Yeah, I should.
Speaker:Evan: Okay, well, this will be... By then, you can go listen to your podcast and subscribe
Speaker:Evan: to all the podcasts, and we'll catch you next time.